首页> 外文期刊>Angiology: the Journal of Vascular Diseases >Should the size threshold for elective abdominal aortic aneurysm repair be lowered in the endovascular era? No.
【24h】

Should the size threshold for elective abdominal aortic aneurysm repair be lowered in the endovascular era? No.

机译:在血管内时代是否应该降低选择性腹主动脉瘤修复的大小阈值?没有。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

According to the current international guidelines, patients with infrarenal or juxtarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) measuring > or = 5.5 cm should undergo repair to reduce the risk of rupture. The 5.5-cm-diameter threshold is the size when the AAA rupture rate balances the mortality rates of elective open surgical AAA repair (3%). Endovascular AAA repair (EVAR) is associated with lower perioperative mortality and complication rates compared with open surgical repair. This debate addresses the issue whether the current size threshold for elective AAA repair needs to be lowered in the endovascular era. This article supports the position that the size threshold for AAA repair should not be lowered.
机译:根据当前的国际准则,肾上或下腹部腹主动脉瘤(AAAs)尺寸大于或等于5.5厘米的患者应接受修复,以减少破裂的风险。直径5.5厘米的阈值是AAA破裂率与择期开放性AAA手术修复的死亡率(3%)达到平衡时的大小。与开放式手术修复相比,血管内AAA修复(EVAR)与较低的围手术期死亡率和并发症发生率相关。这场辩论解决了在血管内时代是否需要降低目前的AAA选择性修复门槛的问题。本文支持不应降低AAA修复的大小阈值的立场。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号