...
首页> 外文期刊>Blood: The Journal of the American Society of Hematology >Comparison of high-dose cytarabine and timed-sequential chemotherapy as consolidation for younger adults with AML in first remission: the ALFA-9802 study.
【24h】

Comparison of high-dose cytarabine and timed-sequential chemotherapy as consolidation for younger adults with AML in first remission: the ALFA-9802 study.

机译:大剂量阿糖胞苷和定时序贯化疗合并首次缓解的年轻AML患者的比较:ALFA-9802研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

To assess the value of administering timed-sequential chemotherapy (TSC; 2 therapeutic sequences separated by a 4-day interval-free chemotherapy) or high-dose cytarabine (HDAraC) cycles in consolidation therapy for acute myeloid leukemia (AML), 459 patients 15 to 50 years of age were enrolled in the prospective randomized Acute Leukemia French Association-9802 trial. Complete remission was achieved in 89%. A total of 237 patients were then randomized to either TSC consolidation (120 patients) or HDAraC consolidation cycles (117 patients). Overall, there was no significant difference between the 2 consolidation arms (5-year event-free survival [EFS]: 41% for HDAraC vs 35% for TSC), or cumulative incidence of relapse, or treatment-related mortality. Cytogenetically normal AML NPM1(+) or CEBPA(+) and FLT3-ITD(-) had the same outcome as those with favorable cytogenetics. When considering favorable and unfavorable risk groups, the trend was in favor of HDAraC. However, the difference became significant when considering intermediate cytogenetics (5-year EFS: 49% vs 29%; P = .02), especially cytogenetically normal AML (5-year EFS: 48% vs 31%; P = .04), which was related to lower relapse rate and less toxicity. This study demonstrates that TSC did not produce any benefit when used as consolidation therapy in younger adults compared with HDAraC. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT00880243.
机译:为了评估定时顺序化疗(TSC; 2个治疗序列,间隔4天无间隔化疗)或大剂量阿糖胞苷(HDAraC)周期在急性髓样白血病(AML)巩固治疗中的价值,459例患者15年龄在50岁至50岁之间的患者参加了法国协会90802进行的前瞻性随机急性白血病试验。完全缓解率达到89%。然后,总共237例患者被随机分为TSC合并(120例)或HDAraC合并周期(117例)。总体而言,两个合并组之间没有显着差异(5年无事件生存期[EFS]:HDAraC为41%,TSC为35%),复发的累积发生率或与治疗相关的死亡率。细胞遗传学正常的AML NPM1(+)或CEBPA(+)和FLT3-ITD(-)的结果与具有良好细胞遗传学的结果相同。在考虑有利和不利的风险组时,趋势倾向于HDAraC。但是,考虑中间细胞遗传学(5年EFS:49%比29%; P = .02),尤其是细胞遗传学正常的AML(5年EFS:48%vs 31%; P = .04),差异变得显着。这与较低的复发率和较低的毒性有关。这项研究表明,与HDAraC相比,TSC在年轻人中用作巩固治疗不会产生任何益处。该试验已在www.clinicaltrials.gov上注册为#NCT00880243。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号