...
首页> 外文期刊>Antiviral therapy >The pattern of pegylated interferon-alpha2b and ribavirin treatment failure in cirrhotic patients depends on hepatitis C virus genotype.
【24h】

The pattern of pegylated interferon-alpha2b and ribavirin treatment failure in cirrhotic patients depends on hepatitis C virus genotype.

机译:肝硬化患者中聚乙二醇化干扰素-α2b和利巴韦林治疗失败的模式取决于丙型肝炎病毒基因型。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Failure of anti-hepatitis C therapy encompasses both primary non-response and post-treatment relapse. Treatment failure to pegylated interferon (PEG-IFN)-alpha2b and ribavirin (RBV) largely depends upon virus genotype, but the interaction between genotype, cirrhosis and pattern of treatment failure is unclear. We aimed to assess whether cirrhosis modifies the pattern of PEG-IFN-alpha2b and RBV treatment failure. METHODS: A total of 471 treatment-naive patients with histologically proven chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection (106 with cirrhosis; 185 with HCV genotype 1 [HCV-1], 157 with HCV genotype 2 [HCV-2], 92 with HCV genotype 3 [HCV-3] and 37 with HCV genotype 4 [HCV-4]) were consecutively treated with PEG-IFN-alpha2b 1.5 microg weekly and weight-based RBV. RESULTS: The sustained virological response (SVR) rates were 31% in HCV-1 and HCV-4, 80% in HCV-2 and 72% in HCV-3, and were lower in cirrhotic than in non-cirrhotic HCV-1 and HCV-4 (17% versus 36%; P=0.01), and HCV-3 (33% versus 79%; P=0.001), but not HCV-2 (69% versus 83%; P=0.1) patients. Treatment failure was the consequence of lower end-of-treatment response rates (37% versus 53%; P=0.06) plus higher post-treatment relapse rates (55% versus 31%; P=0.07) in cirrhotic HCV-1 and HCV-4 patients and higher rates of post-treatment relapse in HCV-2 (29% versus 10%; P=0.01) and HCV-3 cirrhotic patients (61% versus 12%; P<0.001). By multivariate analysis, HCV-1 and HCV-4 (odds ratio [OR] 7.44, 95% confidence interval [CI] 4.87-11.36), and cirrhosis (OR 3.00, 95% CI 1.80-5.00) were independent predictors of treatment failure. CONCLUSIONS: Cirrhosis is an important moderator of SVR, accounting for different patterns of treatment failure in patients infected with different genotypes.
机译:背景:抗丙型肝炎治疗失败包括原发性无反应和治疗后复发。聚乙二醇化干扰素(PEG-IFN)-α2b和利巴韦林(RBV)的治疗失败很大程度上取决于病毒的基因型,但是基因型,肝硬化和治疗失败模式之间的相互作用尚不清楚。我们旨在评估肝硬化是否会改变PEG-IFN-α2b和RBV治疗失败的模式。方法:共有471名未经治疗的未经组织学证实的慢性丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)感染患者(106例肝硬化; 185例HCV基因型1 [HCV-1]; 157例HCV基因型2 [HCV-2]; 92例HCV基因型3 [HCV-3]和HCV基因型4 [HCV-4] 37分别每周接受1.5微克PEG-IFN-α2b和基于体重的RBV治疗。结果:HCV-1和HCV-4的持续病毒学应答率(SVR)分别为HCV-1和HCV-4的31%,HCV-2的80%和HCV-3的72%,而肝硬化患者的持续病毒学应答率低于非肝硬化HCV-1和HCV-1。 HCV-4(17%vs 36%; P = 0.01)和HCV-3(33%vs 79%; P = 0.001),但HCV-2(69%vs 83%; P = 0.1)患者没有。肝硬化HCV-1和HCV的治疗终末缓解率较低(37%对53%; P = 0.06)加上治疗后复发率较高(55%对31%; P = 0.07)的结果是治疗失败-4例患者和HCV-2肝硬化患者(29%对10%; P = 0.01)和HCV-3肝硬化患者的治疗后复发率更高(61%对12%; P <0.001)。通过多变量分析,HCV-1和HCV-4(优势比[OR] 7.44,95%置信区间[CI] 4.87-11.36)和肝硬化(OR 3.00,95%CI 1.80-5.00)是治疗失败的独立预测因子。结论肝硬化是SVR的重要调节剂,可解释感染不同基因型患者的治疗失败的不同模式。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号