...
首页> 外文期刊>Advances in health sciences education: theory and practice >The mediating effect of context variation in mixed practice for transfer of basic science
【24h】

The mediating effect of context variation in mixed practice for transfer of basic science

机译:背景变化在混合实践中对基础科学转移的中介作用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Applying a previously learned concept to a novel problem is an important but difficult process called transfer. Practicing multiple concepts together (mixed practice mode) has been shown superior to practicing concepts separately (blocked practice mode) for transfer. This study examined the effect of single and multiple practice contexts for both mixed and blocked practice modalities on transfer performance. We looked at performance on near transfer (familiar contexts) cases and far transfer (unfamiliar contexts) cases. First year psychology students (n = 42) learned three physiological concepts in a 2 x 2 factorial study (one or two practice contexts and blocked or mixed practice). Each concept was practiced with two clinical cases; practice context was defined as the number of organ systems used (one system per concept vs. two systems). In blocked practice, two practice cases followed each concept; in mixed practice, students learned all concepts before seeing six practice cases. Transfer testing consisted of correctly classifying and explaining 15 clinical cases involving near and far transfer. The outcome was ratings of quality of explanations on a 0-3 scale. The repeated measures analysis showed a significant near versus far by organ system interaction [F(1,38) = 3.4, p < 0.002] with practice with a single context showing lower far transfer scores than near transfer [0.58 (0.37)-0.83 (0.37)] compared to the two contexts which had similar far and near transfer scores [1.19 (0.50)-1.01 (0.38)]. Practicing with two organ contexts had a significant benefit for far transfer regardless of mixed or blocked practice; the single context mixed practice group had the lowest far transfer performance; this was a large effect size (Cohen's d = 0.81). Using only one practice context during practice significantly lowers performance even with the usually superior mixed practice mode. Novices should be exposed to multiple contexts and mixed practice to facilitate transfer.
机译:将先前学到的概念应用于一个新问题是一个重要但困难的过程,称为转移。事实证明,一起练习多个概念(混合练习模式)要比单独练习概念(阻塞练习模式)更好。这项研究检查了混合练习和封闭练习模式中单个和多个练习环境对传递性能的影响。我们研究了近距离转移(熟悉情况)案例和远距离转移(陌生背景)案例的性能。一年级心理学学生(n = 42)在2 x 2阶乘研究中学习了三个生理概念(一个或两个练习环境以及受阻或混合练习)。每个概念都有两个临床案例。实践环境定义为所用器官系统的数量(每个概念一个系统对两个系统)。在封闭式练习中,每个概念遵循两个练习案例。在混合练习中,学生在看到六个练习案例之前学习了所有概念。转移测试包括正确分类和解释涉及近距离和远距离转移的15个临床病例。结果是解释质量的等级为0-3。重复测量分析显示,器官系统之间的交互作用远近与远有显着关系[F(1,38)= 3.4,p <0.002],并且在单个情况下的实践显示远传分数比近传更低[0.58(0.37)-0.83( 0.37)]与远移分数和近移分数相似的两个环境相比[1.19(0.50)-1.01(0.38)]。无论是混合练习还是封闭练习,在两个器官环境中进行练习对于远距离传输都具有明显的好处;单一情境混合练习组的远距离转移表现最低;这是一个很大的效应量(Cohen d = 0.81)。即使在通常采用高级混合练习模式的情况下,练习期间仅使用一种练习环境也会显着降低性能。新手应该接触多种情况和混合实践,以促进迁移。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号