...
首页> 外文期刊>JCO oncology practice. >Lay Health Worker-Led Cancer Symptom Screening Intervention and the Effect on Patient-Reported Satisfaction, Health Status, Health Care Use, and Total Costs: Results From a Tri-Part Collaboration
【24h】

Lay Health Worker-Led Cancer Symptom Screening Intervention and the Effect on Patient-Reported Satisfaction, Health Status, Health Care Use, and Total Costs: Results From a Tri-Part Collaboration

机译:外行卫生工作者主导的癌症症状筛查干预措施以及对患者报告的满意度,健康状况,医疗保健使用和总成本的影响:由三部分合作的结果

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

PURPOSE:Poor patient experiences and increasing costs from undertreated symptoms require approaches that improve patient-reported outcomes and lower expenditures. We developed and evaluated the effect of a lay health worker (LHW)-led symptom screening intervention on satisfaction, self-reported overall and mental health, health care use, total costs, and survival.METHODS:From November 1, 2015, to September 30, 2016, we enrolled in this study all newly diagnosed Medicare Advantage enrollees with stage 3 or 4 solid tumors or hematologic malignancies who were receiving care in a community oncology practice. We evaluated symptom changes from baseline to 12 months for the intervention group. We compared with a control group (a historical cohort of Medicare Advantage enrollees diagnosed with cancer from November 1, 2014, to October 31, 2015) changes in satisfaction and overall and mental health with validated assessments at diagnosis and 5 months postdiagnosis, 12-month health care use, total costs, and survival.RESULTS:Among 186 patients in the intervention group and 102 in the control group, most were female and non-Hispanic white or Hispanic, and the mean age was 79 years. There were no survival differences between the groups. Relative to the control group, the intervention group experienced improvements in satisfaction with care (difference-in-difference: 1.35; 95% CI, 1.08 to 1.63), overall health (odds ratio, 2.23; 95% CI, 1.49 to 3.32), and mental or emotional health (odds ratio, 2.22; 95% CI, 1.46 to 3.38) over time; fewer hospitalizations (mean ? standard deviation: 0.72 ? 0.96 v 1.02 ? 1.44; P = .03) and emergency department visits per 1,000 members per year (0.61 ? 0.98 v 0.92 ? 1.53; P = .03), and lower median (interquartile range) total health care costs ($21,266 [$8,102-$47,900] v $31,946 [$15,754-$57,369]; P = .02).CONCLUSION:An LHW-led symptom screening intervention could be one solution to improve value-based cancer care.
机译:目的:患者经历不良和因症状不足而增加的成本需要改善患者报告的结果和降低支出的方法。我们开发并评估了外行卫生工作者(LHW)领导的症状筛查干预措施对满意度,自我报告的整体和心理健康,医疗保健,总成本和生存的影响。方法:从2015年11月1日到9月30,2016,我们参加了这项研究,所有新诊断的Medicare Advantage入学者都有3或4阶段实体瘤或在社区肿瘤学实践中接受护理的血液系统恶性肿瘤。我们评估了干预组从基线到12个月的症状变化。我们将对照组(从2014年11月1日至2015年10月31日诊断为癌症的历史群体纳入癌症的历史队列)的满意度和整体和心理健康的变化,并在诊断后进行了5个月的验证评估,12个月卫生保健使用,总成本和生存。重新分析:在干预组的186例患者中,对照组有102例,大多数是女性和非西班牙裔白人或西班牙裔,平均年龄为79岁。两组之间没有生存差异。相对于对照组,干预组在满意度方面得到了改善(差异:1.35; 95%CI,1.08至1.63),整体健康(优势比,2.23; 95%CI,1.49至3.32),以及精神或情绪健康(优势比,2.22; 95%CI,1.46至3.38);较少的住院治疗(平均水平偏差:0.72?0.96 V 1.02?1.44; p = .03)和每年1,000名成员的急诊室就诊(0.61?0.98 v 0.92?1.53?1.53; p = .03)和下位数范围)总医疗保健费用($ 21,266 [$ 8,102- $ 47,900] v $ 31,946 [$ 15,754- $ 57,369]; P = .02)。结论:LHW领导的症状筛查干预措施可能是一种解决价值基于价值的癌症护理的解决方案。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号