首页> 外文期刊>Applied biosafety: Journal of the American Biological Safety Association. >A Study of the Effectiveness of the Containment Level-4 (CL-4) Chemical Shower in Decontaminating Dover Positive-Pressure Suits
【24h】

A Study of the Effectiveness of the Containment Level-4 (CL-4) Chemical Shower in Decontaminating Dover Positive-Pressure Suits

机译:4级(CL-4)封闭化学淋浴对多佛正压服消毒的有效性研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Objectives: The decontamination or physical removal of contaminants from personal protective equipment upon exit from high containment laboratories is crucial to maintain containment and safety of laboratory workers. The current methodology for exiting from high-containment level 4 (CL-4) laboratory calls for laboratory personnel to decontaminate their worn positive pressure suits via "mechanical washing" during a 5-minute chemical/water rinse cycle. This study was carried out to evaluate the effectiveness of the current shower methodology and to test the efficacy of the physical removal of any contaminants from the positive pressure suits following the application of water alone and of a milder detergent. Method: Brushed stainless steel test carriers were inoculated with Vesicular Stomatitis Virus (VSV), a surrogate for filoviruses, and a soil load based on mucin, tryptone, and bovine serum albumen (BSA) to mimic serum. The virus mixture was then dried and secured with magnets onto a pre-washed Dover positive pressure suit. The suit was subjected to varying shower cycles, and once complete, carriers were removed and further analyzed. Any remaining virus was quantified using a TCID50 assay on Vero E6 cells showing cyto-pathic effects after 3-5 days. Three positive control carriers with dried inoculum were left untreated by the shower cycle, and negative control carriers (no inoculum) were also included on the suit during shower testing and analyzed alongside the test carriers. Results: No residual virus was detected using the TCID50 method following the normal shower cycle (2-minute chemical wash and 3-minute water rinse). Shower cycles consisting of 5 minutes of water-only rinses were equally as effective in removing virus from the suit. Cyclesconsisting of only a 1-minute water rinse showed a 5.5 log decrease from an average initial 6 log viral concentration. Varying time points between 1 and 5 minutes were evaluated during the normal shower cycle as well as varying concentrations of chemical disinfectant. Conclusion: The current chemical shower protocol is effective in removing all virus from the Dover positive pressure suits worn in high-containment laboratories. However, data show that reducing the need for a high-level decontamination chemical and using any surfactant carries the same effectiveness as the current protocol used, which would serve as a more cost-effective and eco-friendly alternative to the currently implemented shower protocol.
机译:目标:离开高隔离实验室后,从个人防护设备上进行去污或物理去除污染物对于维持实验室工作人员的隔离和安全至关重要。当前退出高污染等级4(CL-4)实验室的方法要求实验室人员在5分钟的化学/水冲洗周期中通过“机械洗涤”对穿着的正压服进行消毒。进行这项研究是为了评估当前淋浴方法的有效性,并测试在单独使用水和较温和的清洁剂后,从正压服中物理去除任何污染物的功效。方法:在刷过的不锈钢测试载体上接种水泡性口腔炎病毒(VSV),丝状病毒的替代物以及基于粘蛋白,胰蛋白tone和牛血清蛋白(BSA)的土壤负荷以模拟血清。然后将病毒混合物干燥并用磁铁固定在预先清洗的Dover正压服上。该防护服经受了不同的淋浴循环,完成后,将携带者取出并进行进一步分析。在3-5天后,使用TCID50分析对Vero E6细胞显示出细胞病变效应的任何剩余病毒进行定量。在淋浴周期中,不处理三种带有干燥接种物的阳性对照载体,并且在淋浴测试过程中还将阴性对照载体(无接种物)包括在防护服中,并与测试载体一起进行分析。结果:在正常淋浴周期(2分钟化学清洗和3分钟水冲洗)后,使用TCID50方法未检测到残留病毒。淋浴循环包括5分钟的纯水冲洗,同样有效地去除了衣服中的病毒。仅用水冲洗1分钟组成的循环显示,与平均初始6 log病毒浓度相比下降了5.5 log。在正常淋浴过程中评估了1至5分钟之间的时间变化以及化学消毒剂的浓度。结论:当前的化学淋浴规程可有效去除高级实验室中穿着的Dover正压服中的所有病毒。但是,数据显示,减少对高级去污剂的需求并使用任何表面活性剂都具有与当前使用的协议相同的效力,这将成为当前实施的淋浴协议的更具成本效益和生态友好的替代方案。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号