...
首页> 外文期刊>Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Water >Why is state‐centered groundwater governance largely ineffective A review
【24h】

Why is state‐centered groundwater governance largely ineffective A review

机译:为什么以国家为中心的地下水治理在很大程度上无效

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Faced with severe groundwater depletion, many governments have opted to increase the power of the state. Despite calls for more inclusive governance and a role for groundwater users, modes of governance have tended to continue to rely on a diversity of policy tools and state‐run strategies in the attempt to control groundwater (over)abstraction. Yet, around the world, the performance of state‐centered governance has remained dismal. Beyond common difficulties in terms of data and financial or humanresources, this article analyzes in greater depth the limited effectiveness of state groundwater policies that has been observed, emphasizing its political ramifications. The various aspects of weak monitoring and enforcement, as well as of the infamous “lack of political will,” are considered from the perspective of the political economy of groundwater economies. Cases of relative success are then used to identify favorable drivers and contexts for effective state‐centered groundwater governance.
机译:面对严重的地下水耗尽,许多政府选择增加国家的权力。尽管呼吁采取更具包容性治理和对地下水使用者的作用,但治理方式倾向于继续依靠多样化的政策工具和国家运营策略来控制地下水(过度)抽象。然而,在世界范围内,以国家为中心的治理表现仍然令人沮丧。在数据,财务或人力资源方面的常见困难之外,本文更深入地分析了已经观察到的国家地下水政策的有限效力,强调了其政治后果。从地下水经济体的政治经济学的角度考虑,弱监测和执行以及臭名昭著的“缺乏政治意志”的各个方面是。然后,相对成功的案例用于确定有效以国家为中性地下水治理的有利驱动因素和环境。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号