【24h】

Covid-19 as a 'breaching experiment': exposing the fractured society

机译:COVID-19作为“违反实验”:暴露于破裂的社会

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

In this brief paper, I argue that the coronavirus pandemic is functioning like an ethnomethodological 'breaching experiment'. In short, it is putting a gigantic spanner in the works of neoliberal governance, in the process exposing the widening cracks and fissures of what I have called the 'fractured society'. I begin by recalling Garfinkel's notion of the breaching experiment and by listing the principal attributes of the fractured society. I then explore the response to the coronavirus in the UK, from the government's initial commitment to 'herd immunity' to its present policy of 'muddling through'. The bulk of the remainder of this contribution addresses precisely how this global health crisis shines a harsh and unforgiving searchlight on the strategies and policies pursued by governments in the UK since 2010, and most especially after the passing of the Health and Social Care Act of 2012. In the closing paragraphs, I examine possible scenarios for a post-fractured society, making particular use of Fraser's concepts on 'reactionary' versus 'progressive populism', and conclude with a comment on sociology and engagement.
机译:在这篇简短的论文中,我认为冠状病毒大流行的功能像是民族化的“违反实验”。简而言之,这使新自由主义治理的著作中的巨大扳手揭示了我所说的“破裂社会”的扩大裂缝和裂缝。我首先回顾了Garfinkel关于违规实验的概念,并列出了破碎的社会的主要属性。然后,我探讨了英国对冠状病毒的反应,从政府对“牧群豁免”的最初承诺到目前的“陷入混乱”的政策。其余的这项贡献的大部分恰恰解决了这场全球健康危机如何在2010年以来对英国政府遵循的战略和政策,尤其是在《 2012年健康与社会护理法》通过之后,如何显得严厉且无情的探索灯。在闭幕式中,我研究了裂缝后社会的可能场景,特别利用了弗雷泽(Fraser)在“反动”与“进步的民粹主义”上的概念,并以对社会学和参与的评论得出结论。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号