首页> 外文期刊>American Journal of Sports Medicine >Hip adduction and abduction strength profiles in elite soccer players: implications for clinical evaluation of hip adductor muscle recovery after injury.
【24h】

Hip adduction and abduction strength profiles in elite soccer players: implications for clinical evaluation of hip adductor muscle recovery after injury.

机译:优秀足球运动员的髋内收和外展强度特征:对受伤后髋内收肌恢复的临床评估的意义。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: An ipsilateral hip adduction/abduction strength ratio of more than 90%, and hip adduction strength equal to that of the contralateral side have been suggested to clinically represent adequate strength recovery of hip adduction strength in athletes after groin injury. However, to what extent side-to-side symmetry in isometric hip adduction and abduction strength can be assumed in soccer players remains uncertain. PURPOSE: To compare isometric hip adduction and abduction strength on the dominant and nondominant side in injury-free soccer players. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: One hundred elite soccer players were included. Maximal unilateral isometric hip adduction and abduction strength on the dominant and nondominant side were measured with a handheld dynamometer, using a reliable test procedure. RESULTS: The dominant side was stronger than the nondominant side for both isometric hip adduction (2.45 +/- 0.54 vs 2.37 +/- 0.48 Nm/kg, P = .02) and hip abduction (2.35 +/- 0.33 vs 2.25 +/- 0.31 Nm/kg, P < .001), corresponding to a 3% and 4% difference, respectively. Isometric hip adduction was greater than isometric hip abduction for both the dominant (2.44 +/- 0.53 vs 2.35 +/- 0.33 Nm/kg, P = .04) and nondominant (2.37 +/- 0.48 vs 2.26 +/- 0.33 Nm/kg, P = .03) side. Isometric hip adduction/abduction ratio was not different between the dominant (1.04 +/- 0.18) and nondominant (1.06 +/- 0.17, P = .40) side. A post hoc analysis showed that isometric hip adduction/abduction ratio was significantly lower in players with groin pain during hip adduction testing compared with players with a pain-free test (0.80 +/- 0.14, P < .001) CONCLUSION: The marginal difference between the dominant and the nondominant side is within the measurement variation of the test procedure, and contralateral isometric hip adduction strength can therefore be used as a simple clinical reference point of full recovery of hip adduction muscle strength in soccer players. Furthermore, it is suggested that the ipsilateral hip adduction/abduction strength ratio is used as a guideline for evaluating hip adduction strength recovery in soccer players with bilateral groin problems.
机译:背景:同侧髋关节内收/外展强度之比超过90%,且髋关节内收强度等于对侧髋关节内收强度,已被认为在临床上代表了腹股沟损伤后运动员髋内收强度的足够恢复。但是,尚不能确定足球运动员在等距髋关节内收和外展强度中左右对称的程度。目的:比较无伤害足球运动员在优势和非优势方面的等距髋关节内收和外展强度。研究设计:横断面研究;证据等级,3。方法:包括100名精英足球运动员。使用手持式测功机,使用可靠的测试程序,测量了优势侧和非优势侧的最大单侧等距髋关节内收和外展强度。结果:对于等距髋关节内收(2.45 +/- 0.54 vs 2.37 +/- 0.48 Nm / kg,P = .02)和髋关节外展(2.35 +/- 0.33 vs 2.25 + /,优势侧均强于非优势侧。 -0.31 Nm / kg,P <0.001),分别对应于3%和4%的差异。对于占主导地位的(2.44 +/- 0.53 vs 2.35 +/- 0.33 Nm / kg,P = .04)和非占优势的(2.37 +/- 0.48 vs 2.26 +/- 0.33 Nm / kg),等距髋关节内收大于等距髋关节外展公斤,P = .03)。优势侧(1.04 +/- 0.18)和非优势侧(1.06 +/- 0.17,P = 0.40)的等距髋关节内收/外展率没有差异。事后分析表明,与进行无痛测试的运动员相比,在进行内收测试的腹股沟疼痛的运动员中,等距髋关节内收/外展比明显更低(0.80 +/- 0.14,P <.001)结论:边际差异主侧和非主侧之间的距离在测试程序的测量范围之内,因此,对侧等距髋关节内收强度可以用作足球运动员髋内收肌力完全恢复的简单临床参考点。此外,建议将同侧髋关节内收/外展强度比用作评估双侧腹股沟问题足球运动员髋关节内收强度恢复的指南。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号