首页> 外文期刊>AEM Education and Training. >Multisource Feedback in the Trauma Context: Priorities and Perspectives
【24h】

Multisource Feedback in the Trauma Context: Priorities and Perspectives

机译:创伤环境中的多源反馈:优先事项和观点

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Objectives: Trauma resuscitations require competence in both clinical and nonclinical skills but these can be difficult to observe and assess. Multisource feedback (MSF) is workplace-based, involves the direct observation of learners, and can provide feedback on nonclinical skills. We sought to compare and contrast the priorities of multidisciplinary trauma team members when assessing resident trauma team captain (TTC) performance. Additionally, we aimed to describe the nature of the assessment and perceived the utility of incorporating MSF into the trauma context. Methods: A convenience sample of 10 trauma team activations were observed. Following each activation, the attending physician trauma team leader (TTL), TTC, and a registered nurse (RN) participated in a semistructured interview. MSF was not provided to the TTC for the purpose of this study because MSF was not part of the assessment process of TTCs at the time of this study and maintaining anonymity may have encouraged more honest interview responses. Transcripts from each assessor group (TTL, TTC, RN) were coded and assigned to one of the five crisis resource management skills: leadership, communication, situational awareness, resource utilization, and problem-solving. Comments were also coded as positive, negative, or neutral as interpreted by the coder.Results: All assessor groups mentioned communication skills most frequently. After communication, the RN and TTC groups commented on situational awareness most frequently, comprising 15 and 29% of their total responses, respectively, whereas 31% of the TTL comments focused on leadership skills. The RN and TTL groups provided positive assessments, with 51 and 42% of their respective comments coded as positive. Forty-five percent of self-assessment comments in the TTC group were negative. All (100%) of the TTC and TTL respondents felt that incorporating MSF would add to the quality of feedback, only 66% of the RN group felt that way. Conclusions: We found that each assessor group brings a unique focus and perspective to the assessment of resident TTC performance. The future inclusion of MSF in the trauma team context has the potential to enhance the learning environment in a clinical arena that is difficult to directly observe and assess.
机译:目的:创伤复苏需要临床和非临床技能的能力,但很难观察和评估。多源反馈(MSF)基于工作场所,涉及对学习者的直接观察,并且可以提供有关非临床技能的反馈。我们试图在评估居民创伤团队队长(TTC)表现时比较和对比多学科创伤团队成员的优先事项。此外,我们旨在描述评估的性质,并认为将MSF纳入创伤环境的实用性。方法:观察到10个创伤团队激活的便利样本。每次激活后,主治医师创伤团队负责人(TTL),TTC和注册护士(RN)参加了半结构化访谈。为了本研究的目的,未向TTC提供MSF,因为MSF在本研究时并不是TTC评估过程的一部分,并且保持匿名性可能会鼓励更诚实的访谈回应。每个评估师组(TTL,TTC,RN)的成绩单被编码并分配给五个危机资源管理技能之一:领导力,沟通,情境意识,资源利用和解决问题。评论也被编码为编码器解释的正面,消极或中性。结果:所有评估者小组最频繁地提到沟通技巧。沟通后,RN和TTC小组最频繁地评论了情境意识,分别占其总反应的15%和29%,而TTL评论中有31%侧重于领导技能。 RN和TTL组提供了积极的评估,其中51%和42%的评论编码为正面评估。 TTC组中45%的自我评估评论为负。所有(100%)TTC和TTL受访者都认为,合并无国界医生的反馈质量会增加,RN组只有66%的感觉。结论:我们发现,每个评估员组都将独特的重点和视角带入了居民TTC绩效的评估。 MSF在创伤团队环境中的未来包含在临床领域中很难直接观察和评估的临床领域的学习环境。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号