...
首页> 外文期刊>American Journal of Sports Medicine >Biomechanical in vitro validation of intramedullary cortical button fixation for distal biceps tendon repair: a new technique.
【24h】

Biomechanical in vitro validation of intramedullary cortical button fixation for distal biceps tendon repair: a new technique.

机译:股骨内侧皮质纽扣固定术在二头肌远端肌腱修复中的生物力学体外验证:一项新技术。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Extramedullary cortical button-based fixation for distal biceps tendon ruptures exhibits maximum load to failure in vitro but cannot restore the anatomic footprint and has the potential risk for injury to the posterior interosseous nerve. HYPOTHESIS: Double intramedullary cortical button fixation repair provides superior fixation strength to the bone when compared with single extramedullary cortical button-based repair. STUDY DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study. METHODS: The technique of intramedullary cortical button fixation with 1 or 2 buttons was compared with single extramedullary cortical button-based repair using 12 paired human cadaveric elbows. All specimens underwent computed tomography analysis to determine intramedullary dimensions of the radial tuberosity as well as the thickness of the anterior and posterior cortices before biomechanical testing. Maximum load to failure and failure modes were recorded. For baseline measurements, the native tendon was tested for maximum load to failure. RESULTS: The intramedullary area of the radial tuberosity provides sufficient space for single or double intramedullary cortical button implantation. The mean thickness of the anterior cortex was 1.13 +/- 0.15 mm, and for the posterior cortex it was 1.97 +/- 0.48 mm (P < .001). We found the highest loads to failure for double intramedullary cortical button fixation with a mean load to failure of 455 +/- 103 N, versus 275 +/- 44 N for single intramedullary cortical button fixation (P < .001) and 305 +/- 27 N for single extramedullary cortical button-based technique (P = .003). There were no statistically significant differences between single intramedullary and single extramedullary button fixation repair (P = .081). The mean load to failure for the native tendon was 379 +/- 87 N. CONCLUSION: Double intramedullary cortical button fixation provides the highest load to failure in the specimens tested. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Double intramedullary cortical button fixation provides reliable fixation strength to the bone for distal biceps tendon repair and potentially minimizes the risk of posterior interosseous nerve injury. Further, based on a 2-point-fixation, this method may offer a wider, more anatomic restoration of the distal biceps tendon to its anatomic footprint.
机译:背景:基于髓外皮质纽扣的肱二头肌腱远端骨折固定在体外表现出最大的失败负荷,但无法恢复解剖学足迹,并有可能伤及后骨间神经。假设:与基于单个髓外皮质纽扣的修复相比,双髓内皮质纽扣固定修复可提供优异的骨固定强度。研究设计:受控实验室研究。方法:比较了使用12个成对的人体尸体肘部进行的单个或两个髓外皮质髓内钉固定术的髓内皮质钮固定术或1个或2个钮的比较。在生物力学测试之前,所有标本都经过计算机断层扫描分析,以确定径向结节的髓内尺寸以及前皮质和后皮质的厚度。记录了最大故障负载和故障模式。对于基线测量,测试了天然肌腱的最大破坏载荷。结果:radial骨的髓内区域为单或双髓内皮质钮扣植入提供了足够的空间。前皮质的平均厚度为1.13 +/- 0.15毫米,后皮质的平均厚度为1.97 +/- 0.48毫米(P <.001)。我们发现双髓内皮质固定术的最大失败负荷为455 +/- 103 N,而单髓内皮质固定术的平均失败为275 +/- 44 N(P <.001)和305 + / -27 N,用于单个基于髓外皮质按钮的技术(P = .003)。单颗髓内和单颗髓外钉固定修复之间无统计学差异(P = .081)。天然肌腱的平均破坏载荷为379 +/- 87N。结论:双髓内皮质皮质钮扣固定在测试样本中提供了最高的破坏载荷。临床意义:双重髓内皮质纽扣固定为二头肌远端腱修复提供了可靠的骨固定强度,并有可能将后骨间神经损伤的风险降至最低。此外,基于两点固定,该方法可以将肱二头肌腱远端的解剖覆盖面更宽,更解剖。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号