首页> 外文期刊>American Journal of Sports Medicine >Repetitive low-energy shock wave treatment for chronic lateral epicondylitis in tennis players.
【24h】

Repetitive low-energy shock wave treatment for chronic lateral epicondylitis in tennis players.

机译:重复性低能量冲击波治疗网球运动员慢性外侧上con炎。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: There is conflicting evidence regarding extracorporeal shock wave treatment for chronic tennis elbow. HYPOTHESIS: Treatment with repetitive low-energy extracorporeal shock wave treatment is superior to repetitive placebo extra-corporeal shock wave treatment. METHODS: Seventy-eight patients enrolled in a placebo-controlled trial. All patients were tennis players with recalcitrant MRI-confirmed tennis elbow of at least 12 months' duration. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either active low-energy extracorporeal shock wave treatment given weekly for 3 weeks (treatment group 1) or an identical placebo extracorporeal shock wave treatment (sham group 2). Main outcome measure was pain during resisted wrist extension at 3 months; secondary measures were >50% reduction of pain and the Upper Extremity Function Scale. RESULTS: At 3 months, there was a significantly higher improvement in pain during resisted wrist extension in group 1 than in group 2 (mean [SD] improvement, 3.5 [2.0] and 2.0 [1.9]; P =.001 for between-group difference of improvement) and in the Upper Extremity Function Scale (mean [SD] improvement, 23.4 [14.8] and 10.9 [14.9]; P <.001 for between-group difference of improvement). In the treatment group, 65% of patients achieved at least a 50% reduction of pain, compared with 28% of patients in the sham group (P =.001 for between-group difference). CONCLUSION: Low-energy extracorporeal shock wave treatment as applied is superior to sham treatment for tennis elbow.
机译:背景:关于体外冲击波治疗慢性网球肘的证据相互矛盾。假设:重复性低能量体外冲击波治疗优于重复性安慰剂体外冲击波治疗。方法:78名患者参加了安慰剂对照试验。所有患者均为网球运动员,经MRI顽固顽固,网球肘至少持续12个月。随机分配患者接受每周3周的主动低能量体外冲击波治疗(治疗组1)或相同的安慰剂体外冲击波治疗(假手术组2)。主要预后指标为3个月抵抗手腕伸展时的疼痛;次要措施是疼痛减轻> 50%和上肢功能量表。结果:在第3个月时,与第2组相比,第1组抵抗手腕伸展期间的疼痛明显改善(平均[SD]改善,分别为3.5 [2.0]和2.0 [1.9];组间P = .001)改善差异)和上肢功能量表(平均[SD]改善,分别为23.4 [14.8]和10.9 [14.9];对于组间改善差异,P <.001)。在治疗组中,有65%的患者疼痛至少减轻了50%,而假手术组中只有28%(组间差异P = .001)。结论:低能量体外冲击波疗法的应用优于网球肘的假手术。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号