首页> 外文期刊>Aphasiology >Treating a semantic word production deficit in aphasia with verbal and gesture methods
【24h】

Treating a semantic word production deficit in aphasia with verbal and gesture methods

机译:用言语和手势方法治疗失语症的语义词产生缺陷

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: Anomia is a common and pervasive word production deficit following stroke. One type of word production deficit concerns primary impairment at the lexical-semantic level. Overall, there is a lack of published studies reporting the effects of therapy for specific semantic-level impairments (Nickels, 2002), and the results from the few existing studies focusing on verbal treatments have varied considerably. Arm and hand gestures have also been suggested as a possible treatment method/modality for word production impairments (Rao, 2001; Rose, Douglas, & Matyas, 2002; Skelly, Schinsky, Smith, & Fust, 1974). Multi-modality treatments have been promoted as being more efficacious than single-modality treatments in the field of speech language pathology, but there is minimal empirical evidence to support this proposal. Overall, speech-language pathologists have little evidence on which to base their choice of gesture or verbal treatment methods.Aims: This study aimed to investigate the relative efficacy of gesture, verbal, and combined verbal plus gesture treatments for an individual with chronic, mild, aphasic word production difficulties arising from lexical-semantic impairment. Methods & Procedures: JB, a 51-year-old female, participated in the study. JB sustained a singe, left, discrete peri-sylvian infarction 40 months prior to the study, which resulted in a mild category-specific anomic aphasia. JB participated in a controlled multiple-baseline single-case experiment comparing the efficacy of the three treatments in the context of carefully balanced sets of words selected from the categories of tools, animals, and musical instruments.Outcomes & Results: Large, statistically significant, and clinically relevant treatment effects were found for all three treatment conditions and there were no significant differences between conditions. Improvements made in word production were maintained at both the 1-month and 3-month follow-up assessments. Generalisation of enhanced word production was found for untrained exemplars of trained items, and for some untrained items, as well as to use in procedural discourse tasks. Conclusions: The results support the potency of a semantic feature analysis type treatment for lexical-semantic impairment. However, the results caution clinicians to question the superiority of combined gesture and verbal treatments for semantic-level word production impairments. Consistent with our previous work (Rose & Douglas, 2001, 2002, in press), it is suggested that the underlying treatment strategy, in this case knowledge about object shape and function, was a more potent factor in treatment outcome than the modality (gesture versus verbal) in which the strategy was presented.
机译:背景:失语症是中风后常见且普遍存在的单词产生缺陷。一种类型的单词产生缺陷涉及词汇语义水平上的主要损伤。总体而言,目前尚无已发表的研究报告了治疗对特定语义水平障碍的影响(Nickels,2002),而针对语言治疗的少数现有研究的结果差异很大。还提出了将手臂和手势作为单词产生障碍的一种可能的治疗方法/方式(Rao,2001; Rose,Douglas,&Matyas,2002; Skelly,Schinsky,Smith,&Fust,1974)。在言语语言病理学领域,多模式治疗比单模式治疗更有效,但仅有很少的经验证据支持该提议。总体而言,言语病理学家几乎没有证据来选择手势或言语治疗方法。目的:本研究旨在调查手势,言语以及联合言语加手势治疗对慢性,轻度患者的相对疗效,由于词汇语义损伤而引起的失语词产生困难。方法与程序:JB,一名51岁的女性,参加了这项研究。在研究开始前40个月,JB患有左鼻窦周围单发性梗塞,导致轻度的类别特异性失语症。 JB参加了一项受控的多基线单例实验,在从工具,动物和乐器等类别中精心平衡的单词集中比较了三种疗法的效果。结果与结果:大型,具有统计意义,在这三种治疗条件下均发现了与临床相关的治疗效果,并且两种条件之间没有显着差异。在1个月和3个月的随访评估中,单词的产生都得到了改善。对于受过训练的项目的未经训练的样本,一些未经训练的项目以及在程序性话语任务中使用的词,发现增强了单词生成的一般性。结论:该结果支持语义特征分析类型对词汇语义损伤的治疗。然而,结果警告临床医生要质疑手势和言语结合治疗对语义水平的单词产生损伤的优越性。与我们之前的工作(Rose&Douglas,2001,2002,印刷中)相一致,建议在这种情况下,基础治疗策略(关于对象形状和功能的知识)比治疗方式(手势)更有效地影响治疗结果而非口头)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号