首页> 外文期刊>ANZ journal of surgery >Is there still a place for Pearson's chi-squared test and Fisher's exact test in surgical research?
【24h】

Is there still a place for Pearson's chi-squared test and Fisher's exact test in surgical research?

机译:在外科研究中还存在培生卡方检验和费舍尔精确检验的地方吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Almost everyone knows of Pearson's chi-squared (%2) test. Karl Pearson described it in 1900,1 although it was another 20 years before RA Fisher demonstrated that Pearson had proposed the wrong degrees of freedom (d.f.) for evaluating the %2 statistic.2 Some may even remember the formula for the statistic:Fisher first described his exact test for 2x2 tables of frequencies in 1925. He used it to analyse a 'thought' experiment that originated in the claim by a colleague, Dr Muriel Bristol, that she could tell by taste whether milk or tea had been added first to a teacup.
机译:几乎每个人都知道Pearson的卡方(%2)测试。卡尔·皮尔森(Karl Pearson)于1900年描述了这一点,尽管距费舍尔(RA Fisher)证明皮尔逊提出了错误的自由度(df)来评估%2统计量还有2年。2有些人甚至还记得该统计公式:描述了他在1925年对2x2频率表的精确测试。他用它来分析“思想”实验,该实验源自同事穆里尔·布里斯托尔(Muriel Bristol)博士的主张,即她可以通过品味判断是否首先添加了牛奶或茶。一个茶杯。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号