首页> 外文期刊>American Journal of Environmental Sciences >River Embankment and Bank Failure: A Study on Geotechnical Characteristics and Stability Analysis
【24h】

River Embankment and Bank Failure: A Study on Geotechnical Characteristics and Stability Analysis

机译:河堤与堤岸破坏:岩土特征及稳定性分析研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Problem statement: Embankment failure and riverbank erosion are common problem in Bangladesh. Almost every year earthen embankments and riverbanks are facing problems like erosion, breaching or retirements. Among many reasons the major causes are considered due to the use of geotechnically unstable materials, improper method of construction, seepage and sliding. In this study the problem is considered geotechnical point of view where the geotechnical properties of failed Jamuna river embankment material and Padma riverbank material were investigated. Moreover, stability analysis technique of embankment has been reviewed through a case study of Manu river embankement. Approach: Sample materials were collected during field investigation and tested atlaboratory according to Japanese Industrial Standard (JIS). Limit equilibrium stability analysis and steady state seepage analysis was conducted for Manu river embankment to review the existing design procedure of embankment. Results: Study results reveal that the soil of Jamuna river embankment is not well graded sand and the permeability is found minimum of 1.29x10-5 cm sec-1 (at w = 24%) which increases rapidly in submerge condition. The maximum strength is found 51.8 kN m~2 which is not preferable as embankment material. Moreover, the slope is not well protected that makes the embankment vulnerable to erosion. In contrast, the soil of Padma riverbank contains mostly sand with 25% clay content. Both permeability and strength of bank material decrease rapidly with the increase of water content. Nevertheless, tension crack and toe erosion also accelerate the mass failure mechanism of riverbank. From case study the Factor of Safety (FS) is found overestimated of about 22-24% in stability analysis of embankment in usual practice. Conclusion: Embankment soil needs to be improved geotechnically to minimize mass failure. Geo-bags, cement composites with reinforcement could be used for slope protection. To obtain reliable factor of safety seepage analysisis recommended in designing stable embankment.
机译:问题陈述:孟加拉国普遍存在路堤破坏和河岸侵蚀的问题。几乎每年的土堤和河岸都面临着侵蚀,破坏或报废等问题。在许多原因中,考虑到主要原因是由于使用了岩土工程不稳定的材料,不适当的施工方法,渗流和滑动。在本研究中,从岩土工程的角度考虑了该问题,在该岩土工程中,研究了失败的贾木纳河路堤材料和帕德玛河河岸材料的岩土特性。另外,以马努河路堤为例,对路堤的稳定性分析技术进行了综述。方法:在现场调查中收集样品材料,并根据日本工业标准(JIS)在实验室进行测试。对Manu河路堤进行了极限平衡稳定分析和稳态渗流分析,以回顾现有路堤的设计程序。结果:研究结果表明,贾木纳河路堤土壤的砂质等级不高,渗透率最低为1.29x10-5 cm sec-1(w = 24%),在淹没条件下渗透率迅速增加。发现最大强度为51.8 kN m〜2,不适合作为路堤材料。而且,斜坡没有得到很好的保护,这使得路堤容易受到侵蚀。相比之下,帕德玛(Padma)河岸的土壤主要是含25%粘土的沙子。随着含水量的增加,堤岸材料的渗透性和强度均迅速下降。尽管如此,张力裂缝和脚趾侵蚀也加速了河岸的整体破坏机制。通过案例研究,在通常的做法中,在路堤的稳定性分析中发现安全系数(FS)被高估了约22-24%。结论:路堤土壤需要进行岩土改良,以最大程度减少质量破坏。土工布袋,水泥增强复合材料可用于边坡防护。为了获得可靠的安全系数,建议在设计稳定路堤时进行渗流分析。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号