...
首页> 外文期刊>ANZ journal of surgery >Diagnostic value of routine aqueous contrast swallow examination after oesophagectomy for detecting leakage of the cervical oesophagogastric anastomosis.
【24h】

Diagnostic value of routine aqueous contrast swallow examination after oesophagectomy for detecting leakage of the cervical oesophagogastric anastomosis.

机译:食管切除术后例行水造影剂吞咽检查对宫颈食管胃吻合口漏诊的诊断价值。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

BACKGROUND: Water-soluble contrast swallow examination is routinely carried out after oesophagectomy to detect leakage of the cervical oesophagogastric anastomosis. This study evaluated the diagnostic accuracy and clinical value. METHODS: Patients with oesophageal carcinoma who underwent oesophagectomy with gastric conduit formation and a hand-sewn cervical anastomosis between 1989 and 2003 were reviewed on outcome of routine aqueous contrast swallow examination (RACSE) and appearance of clinical anastomotic leakage. RESULTS: An RACSE was carried out in 207 (82%) of 252 patients on postoperative day 8 (range 3-15). In 45 patients, no RACSE was executed, mainly because of a prolonged stay in intensive care unit. In 18 (9%) of 207 cases, the RACSE could not be interpreted by the radiologist. In 19 (53%) of 36 patients who developed a clinical leakage, the leak had already manifested clinically before the routine contrast examination was planned. Taken together, the false-positive rate was 8%, the false-negative rate 48%, sensitivity 52%, specificity 92%, positive predictive value 46% and negative predictive value 93%. No significant differences were found between the accuracy of RACSE in end-to-end or end-to-side cervical anastomoses. CONCLUSION: Given the very low sensitivity and low positive predictive value and given the fact that in 53% of patients with a clinical leak, the leakage had appeared clinically before the contrast swallow examination was routinely planned, we propose to abandon the routine contrast swallow examination after oesophagectomy to detect cervical anastomotic leakage. Alternatively, anastomotic integrity can be tested by drinking small amounts of water with simultaneous observation of the cervical wound.
机译:背景:食管切除术后常规进行水溶性对比剂吞咽检查,以检测宫颈食管胃吻合口的渗漏。这项研究评估了诊断准确性和临床价值。方法:回顾性分析了1989年至2003年间经食道切除术并伴有胃导管形成和手工缝制颈吻合术的食管癌患者的常规食管造影剂吞咽检查(RACSE)的结果和临床吻合口漏的外观。结果:252例患者中的207例(82%)在术后第8天(范围3-15)进行了一次RACSE。在45例患者中,没有执行RACSE,主要是因为长期在重症监护室住院。在207例病例中有18例(9%)中,放射科医师无法解释RACSE。在36例发生临床渗漏的患者中,有19例(53%)在计划进行常规对比检查之前已经在临床上发现了渗漏。综合起来,假阳性率为8%,假阴性率为48%,敏感性为52%,特异性为92%,阳性预测值为46%,阴性预测值为93%。在端对端或端对侧宫颈吻合术中,RACSE的准确性之间没有发现显着差异。结论:鉴于敏感性极低且阳性预测值较低,并且在53%的临床漏诊患者中,在常规计划进行对比吞咽检查之前就已经出现了漏诊现象,因此我们建议放弃常规的对比吞咽检查食道切除术后要检查宫颈吻合口漏。或者,可以通过喝少量水同时观察宫颈伤口来测试吻合的完整性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号