首页> 外文期刊>Anthropologischer Anzeiger >Comparison of somatotype differences of soccer and handball players based on the methods of German and Anglo-American schools of constitutional biology
【24h】

Comparison of somatotype differences of soccer and handball players based on the methods of German and Anglo-American schools of constitutional biology

机译:基于德国和英美宪法学流派的方法比较足球和手球运动员的体型差异

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

39 soccer players of the third division as well as 22 handball players of the second division and 17 handball fourth division players (average age 24 years) were examined kinanthropometrically. The sports anthropological evaluations were made according to the methods of Parnell (1958), Heath & Carter (1967), Conrad (1963), Knussmann (1961a, 1961b) as well as Tittel & Wutscherk (1972). Regarding the proportionality, proportion figures and phantom stratagem were used. In the typology of Conrad (1963) above all the high hyperplasia values of the handball players stand out. According to the typognosis of Knussmann (1961a, 1961b) the handball and soccer players are to be classified as leptomorph. The tendency to the macrosomia pole is to be recognized for the handball players. In the somatochart of Parnell (1958) soccer and handball players are placed in the mesomorph ectomorph sixth. The group differences are highly significant for the endomorphy. In the somatogramm of Heath & Carter (1967) both ballplayer collectives are settled in the ectomorph mesomorph area. The group differences are here for the endomorphy and mesomorphy highly significant, for the ectomorphy significant. The proportional fat portion (calipermetry) is high-significantly lower for the soccer players with 6.6 +/- 1.6 % than for the handball players (8.4 +/- 2.5 %). All height and longitudinal dimensions as well as the circumferences with exception of the thigh girth were for the larger handball players (body height: 189.1 +/- 7.9 cm) very to highly significantly higher than for the smaller soccer players (body height: 178.6 +/- 5.8 cm), whereby no important proportional differences were registered.
机译:第三名的39名足球运动员,第二名的22名手球运动员和第四名的17名手球运动员(平均年龄为24岁)进行了人体重量分析。体育人类学评估是根据Parnell(1958),Heath&Carter(1967),Conrad(1963),Knussmann(1961a,1961b)以及Tittel&Wutscherk(1972)的方法进行的。关于比例,使用了比例数字和幻影策略。在康拉德(Conrad,1963)的类型学中,手球运动员的所有增生价值都很高。根据克努斯曼(1961a,1961b)的打字病,手球和足球运动员应归类为假体。手球运动员应认识到巨人杆的趋势。在Parnell(1958年)的躯体学中,足球运动员和手球运动员被置于中等形态的第六形态。群体差异对于内态而言非常重要。在Heath&Carter(1967)的躯体图像中,两个球手集合体都位于ectomorph mesomorph地区。在这里,组差异对于内态和中观是高度显着的,对于外形态而言是显着的。比例脂肪部分(热量测定法)对于足球运动员而言为6.6 +/- 1.6%,明显低于手球运动员(8.4 +/- 2.5%)。除大腿围外,所有身高和纵向尺寸以及周长均适用于较大的手球运动员(身高:189.1 +/- 7.9厘米),远远高于较小的足球运动员(身高:178.6 +) /-5.8厘米),因此没有发现重要的比例差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号