...
首页> 外文期刊>Annals of epidemiology >Internet and telephonic IVR mixed-mode survey for longitudinal studies: Choice, retention, and data equivalency
【24h】

Internet and telephonic IVR mixed-mode survey for longitudinal studies: Choice, retention, and data equivalency

机译:用于纵向研究的Internet和电话IVR混合模式调查:选择,保留和数据等效性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Purpose: This study examined data equivalency and loss to follow-up rates from Internet and interactive voice response (IVR) system surveys in a prospective-cohort study. Methods: 475 limited-service restaurant workers participating in the 12-week study were given a choice to report their weekly slipping experience by either IVR or Internet. Demographic differences, loss to follow-up, self-reported rates of slipping, and selection of first and last choices were compared. Results: Loss to follow-up rates were slightly higher for those choosing the IVR mode. Rates of slipping and selection of first and last choices were not significantly different between survey modes. Propensity to choose an Internet survey decreased with increasing age, and was the lowest among Spanish speakers (5%) and those with less than a high school education (14%). Conclusions: Studies relying solely on Internet-based data collection may lead to selective exclusion of certain populations. Findings suggest that Internet and IVR may be combined as survey modalities within longitudinal studies.
机译:目的:本研究在一项前瞻性队列研究中研究了互联网和交互式语音应答(IVR)系统调查中数据的等效性和随访率的损失。方法:475名参加12周研究的有限服务餐馆员工可以选择通过IVR或Internet报告每周的滑倒经历。比较了人口统计学差异,后续失访,自我报告的失误率以及首选和最终选择。结果:选择IVR模式的人的随访率损失略高。两种调查模式之间的滑移率以及第一和最后选择的选择率没有显着差异。随着年龄的增长,选择互联网调查的倾向下降,在讲西班牙语的人中最低(5%)和学历不到高中的人最低(14%)。结论:仅依靠基于互联网的数据收集的研究可能导致某些人群的选择性排斥。研究结果表明,互联网和IVR可以作为纵向研究中的调查方式进行组合。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号