首页> 外文期刊>Annals of family medicine >Managing expectations of antibiotics for upper respiratory tract infections: A qualitative study
【24h】

Managing expectations of antibiotics for upper respiratory tract infections: A qualitative study

机译:定性研究:管理对上呼吸道感染的抗生素期望

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose: Communication experts have suggested that it is good practice to ask patients' directly whether they expect to receive antibiotics as part of asking about the triad of ideas, concerns, and expectations for health care. Our aim was to explore the views and experiences of family physicians about using this strategy with their patients, focusing the interview on the problem of eliciting expectations of antibiotics as a possible treatment for upper respiratory tract infections. Methods: We conducted a qualitative study using semistructured interviews with 20 family physicians in South Wales, United Kingdom, and performing thematic analysis. Results: Family physicians assumed most patients or parents wanted antibiotics, as well as wanting to be "checked out" to make sure the illness was "nothing serious." Physicians said they did not ask direct questions about expectations, as that might lead to confrontation. They preferred to elicit expectations for antibiotics in an indirect manner, before performing a physical examination. The majority described reporting their findings of the examination as a "running commentary" so as to influence expectations and help avoid generating resistance to a soon-tobe- made-explicit plan not to prescribe antibiotics. The physicians used the running commentary to preserve and enhance the physician-patient relationship. Conclusions: Real-world family physicians use indirect methods to explore expectations for treatment and, on the basis of their physical examination, build an argument for reassuring the patient or parent. In contrast to proposed models in the communication literature, interventions to promote appropriate antibiotic prescribing might include a focus on training in communication skills that (1) integrates these indirect methods as part of building collaborative physicianpatient relationships and (2) uses the running commentary of examination findings to facilitate participation in clinical decisions.
机译:目的:交流专家建议,最好的做法是直接询问患者是否希望接受抗生素,这是询问有关医疗保健观念,问题和期望三方性的一部分。我们的目的是探讨家庭医生与患者一起使用这种策略的观点和经验,并将访谈重点放在引起对抗生素期望作为上呼吸道感染的可能治疗方法的问题上。方法:我们使用半结构化访谈对英国南威尔士州的20位家庭医生进行了定性研究,并进行了主题分析。结果:家庭医生认为大多数患者或父母都希望使用抗生素,并希望对其进行“检查”以确保该疾病“没有严重”。内科医生说,他们没有问关于期望的直接问题,因为这可能导致对抗。他们倾向于在进行体格检查之前以间接的方式引起对抗生素的期望。大多数人将报告他们的检查结果描述为“连续评论”,以影响预期并帮助避免对即将制定的不开抗生素处方的计划产生抵抗力。医生使用连续注释来保存和增强医患关系。结论:现实世界中的家庭医生使用间接方法探索对治疗的期望,并在身体检查的基础上,为使患者或父母放心建立论据。与交流文献中提出的模型相反,促进适当抗生素处方的干预措施可能包括侧重于交流技巧的培训,该交流方式是:(1)将这些间接方法整合为建立合作医患关系的一部分;(2)使用运行中的检查注释有助于参与临床决策的发现。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号