首页> 外文期刊>Annals of family medicine >Barriers to implementation of case management for patients with dementia: A systematic mixed studies review
【24h】

Barriers to implementation of case management for patients with dementia: A systematic mixed studies review

机译:痴呆症患者实施病例管理的障碍:系统的混合研究回顾

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

PURPOSE Results of case management designed for patients with dementia and their caregivers in community-based primary health care (CBPHC) were inconsistent. Our objective was to identify the relationships between key outcomes of case management and barriers to implementation.METHODS We conducted a systematic mixed studies review (including quantitative and qualitative studies). Literature search was performed in MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Embase, and Cochrane Library (1995 up to August 2012). Case management intervention studies were used to assess clinical outcomes for patients, service use, caregiver outcomes, satisfaction, and cost-effectiveness. Qualitative studies were used to examine barriers to case management implementation. Patterns in the relationships between barriers to implementation and outcomes were identified using the configurational comparative method. The quality of studies was assessed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool.RESULTS Forty-three studies were selected (31 quantitative and 12 qualitative). Case management had a limited positive effect on behavioral symptoms of dementia and length of hospital stay for patients and on burden and depression for informal caregivers. Interventions that addressed a greater number of barriers to implementation resulted in increased number of positive outcomes. Results suggested that high-intensity case management was necessary and sufficient to produce positive clinical outcomes for patients and to optimize service use. Effective communication within the CBPHC team was necessary and sufficient for positive outcomes for caregivers.CONCLUSIONS Clinicians and managers who implement case management in CBPHC should take into account high-intensity case management (small caseload, regular proactive patient follow-up, regular contact between case managers and family physicians) and effective communication between case managers and other CBPHC professionals and services.
机译:目的在社区初级保健(CBPHC)中为痴呆症患者及其护理人员设计的病例管理结果不一致。我们的目标是确定案件管理的关键成果与实施障碍之间的关系。方法我们进行了系统的混合研究评估(包括定量和定性研究)。在MEDLINE,PsycINFO,Embase和Cochrane图书馆中进行了文献检索(1995年至2012年8月)。病例管理干预研究用于评估患者的临床结局,服务使用,护理者结局,满意度和成本效益。定性研究用于检查实施案例管理的障碍。使用构型比较方法确定了实施障碍与成果之间关系的模式。使用混合方法评估工具评估研究质量。结果选择了43项研究(31项定量和12项定性)。病例管理对痴呆的行为症状和患者住院时间以及对非正式护理者的负担和抑郁的积极作用有限。解决了更多实施障碍的干预措施带来了更多积极成果。结果表明,高强度病例管理是必要的,并且足以为患者带来积极的临床结果并优化服务使用。 CBPHC团队内部进行有效的沟通对于使护理人员取得积极成果是必要和充分的。结论在CBPHC中实施病例管理的临床医生和管理人员应考虑到高强度病例管理(小病例,定期积极的患者随访,病例间定期接触)经理和家庭医生),以及案件经理与CBPHC其他专业人员和服务之间的有效沟通。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号