首页> 外文期刊>Annals of family medicine >Creating innovative research designs: the 10-year Methodological Think Tank case study.
【24h】

Creating innovative research designs: the 10-year Methodological Think Tank case study.

机译:创建创新的研究设计:十年的方法论智囊团案例研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

PURPOSE: Addressing important but complex research questions often necessitates the creation of innovative mixed methods designs. This report describes an approach to developing research designs for studying important but methodologically challenging research questions. METHODS: The Methodological Think Tank has been held annually in conjunction with the Primary Care Research Methods and Statistics Conference in San Antonio since 1994. A group of 3 to 4 methodologists with expertise balanced between quantitative and qualitative backgrounds is invited by the think tank coordinators to serve on a 2-day think tank to discuss a research question selected from those submitted in response to a call for proposals. During the first half-day, these experts explore the content area with the investigator, often challenging beliefs and assumptions. During the second half-day, the think tank participants systematically prune potential approaches until a desirable research method is identified. RESULTS: To date, themost recent 7 think tanks have produced fundable research designs, with 1 being funded by a K award and 4 by R01 grants. All participating investigators attributed much of their success to think tank participation. Lessons learned include (1) the importance of careful selection of participating methodologists, (2) all think tank communities of inquiry must go through 4 stages of development from pseudocommunity to community, and (3) the critical importance of listening by the investigator. CONCLUSION: Researchers and academic departments could use this process locally to develop innovative research designs.
机译:目的:解决重要但复杂的研究问题通常需要创建创新的混合方法设计。本报告介绍了一种开发研究设计的方法,用于研究重要但在方法上具有挑战性的研究问题。方法:自1994年以来,方法论智囊团每年与圣安东尼奥市初级保健研究方法和统计会议一起举行。智囊团协调员邀请3至4名在定量和定性背景之间具有专业知识平衡的方法论者参加。在为期2天的智囊团中,讨论从为征集提案而提交的研究中选择的研究问题。在前半天,这些专家与研究人员一起探索内容领域,这些挑战通常挑战着信念和假设。在第二个半天中,智囊团参与者会系统地修剪潜在的方法,直到确定了理想的研究方法。结果:迄今为止,最近的7个智囊团已经完成了可资助的研究设计,其中1个由K奖资助,4个由R01资助。所有参与调查的研究人员都将其成功归功于智囊团的参与。获得的经验教训包括:(1)认真选择参与方法论者的重要性;(2)所有智囊团的调查社区必须经历从伪社区到社区的四个发展阶段;(3)调查员倾听的至关重要性。结论:研究人员和学术部门可以在本地使用此过程来开发创新的研究设计。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号