...
首页> 外文期刊>Annals of Emergency Medicine: Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians and the University Association for Emergency Medicine >Erythromycin infusion or gastric lavage for upper gastrointestinal bleeding: a multicenter randomized controlled trial.
【24h】

Erythromycin infusion or gastric lavage for upper gastrointestinal bleeding: a multicenter randomized controlled trial.

机译:红霉素输注或洗胃治疗上消化道出血:一项多中心随机对照试验。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

STUDY OBJECTIVE: The quality of endoscopy depends on the quality of upper gastrointestinal tract preparation. We determine whether in acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding the frequency of satisfactory stomach visualization was different after intravenous erythromycin, a nasogastric tube with gastric lavage, or both. METHODS: We performed a prospective, randomized, multicenter (6 emergency departments) study in patients with acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding presenting with hematemesis or melena. The patients were randomized into 3 groups: (1) intravenous erythromycin infusion without nasogastric tube placement (erythromycin group), (2) nasogastric tube placement without erythromycin (nasogastric group), and (3) intravenous erythromycin infusion combined with nasogastric tube placement (nasogastric-erythromycin group). The main outcome measure was the proportion of satisfactory stomach visualization. RESULTS: Two hundred fifty-three patients (181 men, mean age 61 years [SD 15 years], 84 with cirrhosis) were randomized: 84 (erythromycin group), 85 (nasogastric group), and 84 (nasogastric-erythromycin group). Overall, there was 85% satisfactory stomach visualization; between-group differences were not significant: -4% (95% confidence interval [CI] -15% to 6%) for the erythromycin group and nasogastric-erythromycin group, 2% (95% CI -14% to 9%) for the erythromycin group and nasogastric group, and -6.5% (95% CI -17% to 4%) for the nasogastric group and nasogastric-erythromycin group. The duration of the endoscopic procedure, rebleeding frequency, the need for a second endoscopy, the number of transfused blood units, and mortality at days 2, 7, and 30 did not differ significantly between groups. CONCLUSION: In acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding, administration of intravenous erythromycin provides satisfactory endoscopic conditions, without the need for a nasogastric tube and gastric lavage.
机译:研究目的:内窥镜检查的质量取决于上消化道制剂的质量。我们确定在急性上消化道出血中,静脉注射红霉素,鼻胃管洗胃后,令人满意的胃部显像的频率是否有所不同。方法:我们对有呕血或黑便的急性上消化道出血患者进行了一项前瞻性,随机,多中心(6个急诊科)研究。将患者随机分为3组:(1)不用鼻胃管放置的红霉素静脉输液(红霉素组),(2)不使用红霉素的鼻胃管放置(鼻胃组)和(3)结合鼻胃管放置的红霉素静脉输液(鼻胃) -红霉素组)。主要结果指标是令人满意的胃部可视化的比例。结果:253例患者(181例男性,平均年龄61岁[SD 15岁],其中84例患有肝硬化)被随机分为:84例(红霉素组),85例(鼻胃组)和84例(鼻胃-红霉素组)。总体而言,有85%的胃部可视化令人满意;组间差异不显着:红霉素组和鼻胃-红霉素组为-4%(95%置信区间[CI] -15%至6%),对于红霉素组为2%(95%CI -14%至9%)。红霉素组和鼻胃组,鼻胃组和鼻胃-红霉素组为-6.5%(95%CI -17%至4%)。两组之间的内窥镜检查持续时间,出血频率,第二次内窥镜检查的需要,输血单位的数量以及第2、7和30天的死亡率没有显着差异。结论:在急性上消化道出血中,静脉给予红霉素可提供令人满意的内窥镜检查条件,而无需鼻胃管和洗胃。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号