...
首页> 外文期刊>Annals of Emergency Medicine: Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians and the University Association for Emergency Medicine >Time patients spend in the emergency department: England's 4-hour rule - A case of hitting the target but missing the point?
【24h】

Time patients spend in the emergency department: England's 4-hour rule - A case of hitting the target but missing the point?

机译:患者在急诊室花费的时间:英格兰的4小时规则-遇上目标但错过了要点吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Study objective: To address concerns about prolonged emergency department (ED) stays from crowding, England mandated that the maximum length of ED stay for 98% of patients be no greater than 4 hours. We evaluate the effect of the mandated ED care intervals in England. Methods: This was a retrospective analysis of ED patient throughput before, during, and after implementation of the target. Fifteen acute hospital trusts' ED data were purposively sampled, including all patient visits during May and June of 2003 to 2006. We compared total time in ED and time to clinician across years, segregating for admitted versus discharged patients and young versus old patients, using a random-effects regression model and adjusting for hospital clustering. Results: We analyzed 735,588 ED visits. The proportion of patients seen and treated within 4 hours improved from 83.9% to 96.3%. Adjusted total length of ED stay from 2003 to 2006 increased by 8.6 minutes for all patients and 30 minutes for admissions; time to physician improved by 1 minute for all patients. The proportion of patients leaving the ED during the last 20 minutes before 4 hours increased from 4.7% of all patients in 2003 to 8.4% in 2006. Admitted patients were more likely than discharged ones to leave the ED in the last 20 minutes, and the relative likelihood increased each year after 2003, with incidence rate ratio 1.04 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.78 to 1.39), 1.39 (95% CI 1.05 to 1.82), and 1.55 (95% CI 1.19 to 2.20) for 2004, 2005, and 2006, respectively. An increasing proportion of elderly patients were in the last 20-minute departure interval each year compared with younger patients (in 2003 7.4% versus 4.1%; in 2006 17.3% versus 6.3%). Conclusion: The introduction of a time target reduced the proportion of patients staying greater than 4 hours. More patients departed within 20 minutes of the target 4-hour interval after the mandate, notably, the elderly.
机译:研究目的:为了解决人们对急诊科(ED)长时间待命的担忧,英格兰要求98%的患者的最大ED住院时间不超过4小时。我们评估了英格兰强制性ED护理间隔的影响。方法:这是对在实现目标之前,之中和之后对急诊急诊病人吞吐量的回顾性分析。目的抽取15个急诊医院信托的ED数据,包括2003年5月和6月至2006年的所有患者来访。我们比较了ED的总时间和多年的临床时间,分别使用入院与出院患者,年轻与老年患者进行了比较。随机效应回归模型并针对医院聚类进行调整。结果:我们分析了735,588次ED访问。 4小时内看诊和治疗的患者比例从83.9%提高到96.3%。从2003年到2006年,调整后的ED住院时间在所有患者中增加了8.6分钟,在住院期间增加了30分钟;所有患者的就医时间缩短了1分钟。在4小时前的最后20分钟内离开ED的患者比例从2003年的所有患者的4.7%增加到2006年的8.4%。入院患者比出院的患者在最近20分钟内离开ED的可能性更高,并且相对可能性在2003年之后逐年增加,2004、2005年的发生率分别为1.04(95%置信区间[CI] 0.78至1.39),1.39(95%CI 1.05至1.82)和1.55(95%CI 1.19至2.20)。 ,和2006年。与年轻患者相比,每年在最近的20分钟离开间隔中的老年患者比例有所增加(2003年为7.4%对4.1%; 2006年为17.3%对6.3%)。结论:时间目标的引入减少了住院时间超过4小时的患者比例。在任务执行后的4小时间隔内,有更多的患者在目标4小时内离开,尤其是老年人。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号