首页> 外文期刊>Annals of Emergency Medicine: Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians and the University Association for Emergency Medicine >Apparent life-threatening event: Multicenter prospective cohort study to develop a clinical decision rule for admission to the hospital
【24h】

Apparent life-threatening event: Multicenter prospective cohort study to develop a clinical decision rule for admission to the hospital

机译:明显威胁生命的事件:多中心前瞻性队列研究为医院入院制定临床决策规则

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Study objective: We identify factors in emergency department (ED) patients presenting with apparent lifethreatening events that distinguish those safe for discharge from those warranting hospitalization. Methods: Data were prospectively collected on all subjects presenting to 4 EDs with apparent life-threatening events. Patients were observed for subsequent events or interventions, defined a priori, which would have mandated hospital admission (eg, hypoxia, apnea, bradycardia that is not self-resolving, or serious bacterial infection). For patients discharged from the ED, telephone follow-up was arranged. Classification and regression tree analysis was performed to delineate admission predictors. Results: A total of 832 subjects were enrolled. The overall median age was 31.5 days (interquartile range 10 to 90 days); 427 (51.3%) were male patients, and 513 (61.7%) arrived by emergency medical services. One hundred ninety-one (23.0%) infants had a significant intervention warranting hospitalization. One hundred thirtyseven patients (16.5%) met predetermined criteria that would obviously mandate hospital admission (eg, persistent hypoxia requiring oxygen) by the end of their ED stay. In addition to these patients for whom it was obvious that admission would be necessary in the ED, classification and regression tree analysis (receiver operating curve-0.90) yielded 2 factors predictive of hospitalization: having a significant medical history and having greater than 1 apparent life-threatening event in 24 hours. The sensitivity was 89.0% (95% confidence interval 83.5% to 92.9%); specificity was 61.9% (95% confidence interval 58.0% to 65.7%). Conclusion: We found 3 variables (obvious need for admission, significant medical history, -1 apparent lifethreatening event in 24 hours) that identified most but not all infants with apparent life-threatening events necessitating admission. These variables require external validation and reliability assessment before clinical implementation.
机译:研究目的:我们确定出现明显危及生命的事件的急诊科(ED)患者的因素,这些事件将那些可以安全出院的人与需要住院的人区分开来。方法:前瞻性地收集了所有出现在4例ED上威胁生命的ED的数据。观察患者的后续事件或干预措施,这些事件或干预措施是事先确定的,这些事件或干预措施将迫使患者入院(例如,低氧,呼吸暂停,不能自行解决的心动过缓或严重的细菌感染)。对于急诊出院的患者,安排了电话随访。进行分类和回归树分析来描述入学预测因素。结果:共纳入832名受试者。总体中位年龄为31.5天(四分位间距为10到90天);男性患者为427名(51.3%),而急诊医疗机构则为513名(61.7%)。一百一十九(23.0%)婴儿接受了重大干预,需要住院治疗。一百三十七名患者(16.5%)符合预定标准,这些标准显然会在他们的ED住院结束前强制住院(例如,持续缺氧需要氧气)。除了这些显然需要急诊入院的患者之外,分类和回归树分析(接收者工作曲线为0.90)还产生了2个预测住院的因素:有明显的病史和明显的1年以上的生命-24小时内发生威胁事件。灵敏度为89.0%(95%置信区间83.5%至92.9%);特异性为61.9%(95%置信区间为58.0%至65.7%)。结论:我们发现了3个变量(明显的入院需求,重要的病史,24小时内有-1个明显的危及生命的事件),这些变量确定了大多数但并非全部婴儿,有明显的危及生命的事件需要入院。这些变量需要在临床实施之前进行外部验证和可靠性评估。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号