首页> 外文期刊>Annals of vascular surgery >A Prospective randomized controlled clinical trial on clopidogrel combined with warfarin versus clopidogrel alone in the prevention of restenosis after endovascular treatment of the femoropopliteal artery
【24h】

A Prospective randomized controlled clinical trial on clopidogrel combined with warfarin versus clopidogrel alone in the prevention of restenosis after endovascular treatment of the femoropopliteal artery

机译:氯吡格雷联合华法林与氯吡格雷单独预防股Pro动脉腔内治疗后再狭窄的前瞻性随机对照临床试验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: We sought to compare the effects of clopidogrel combined with warfarin with clopidogrel alone in the prevention of restenosis after endovascular treatment (EVT) of the femoropopliteal artery. Methods: Between June 2008 and May 2009, 88 consecutive patients referred for EVT were randomly divided into a clopidogrel group (42 cases) and a clopidogrel combined with warfarin group (46 cases) before the procedure. Examinations including staging of peripheral arterial disease by Rutherford, ankle-brachial index, and color duplex ultrasonography were performed at baseline, 1 week, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months after procedure. At the same time, bleeding complications were observed. Results: Fifty patients (63 limbs) were included after 12 months of follow-up, in which 25 patients (30 limbs) were from the clopidogrel group and 25 patients (33 limbs) were from the combination group. At 3 months, the rates of restenosis on duplex ultrasonography were 17% in the clopidogrel group and 18% in the combination group (P = 1.0). At 6 months, the accumulated restenosis rates were 37% and 36% (P = 0.98), respectively. At 12 months, the accumulated restenosis rates were 53% and 42% (P = 0.523), respectively. The rate of clinical bleeding events was 21% (6/29) in the combination group compared with 7% (2/27) in the clopidogrel group, and there was no statistical difference (P = 0.3). Conclusions: The combination of clopidogrel with warfarin was not more effective than clopidogrel alone in restenosis prevention for patients who underwent EVT. Instead, the combination of antiplatelet and anticoagulation therapy was inclined to increase the clinical bleeding events.
机译:背景:我们试图比较氯吡格雷与华法林联合单独使用氯吡格雷对预防股pop动脉血管内治疗(EVT)后再狭窄的作用。方法:自2008年6月至2009年5月,将88例接受EVT治疗的患者在手术前随机分为氯吡格雷组(42例)和氯吡格雷联合华法林组(46例)。术中,术后1周,3个月,6个月和12个月进行检查,包括通过卢瑟福(Rutherford)进行的外周动脉疾病分期,踝臂指数和彩色双工超声检查。同时,观察到出血并发症。结果:随访12个月后收治了50例患者(63个肢体),其中氯吡格雷组25例(30个肢体),联合组25例(33个肢体)。在3个月时,氯吡格雷组在双重超声检查下的再狭窄率为17%,联合组为18%(P = 1.0)。在6个月时,累积的再狭窄率分别为37%和36%(P = 0.98)。在12个月时,累积的再狭窄率分别为53%和42%(P = 0.523)。联合组的临床出血事件发生率为21%(6/29),而氯吡格雷组为7%(2/27),无统计学差异(P = 0.3)。结论:氯吡格雷与华法林联合使用在预防EVT的再狭窄方面没有比单独使用氯吡格雷更有效。相反,抗血小板和抗凝治疗的结合倾向于增加临床出血事件。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号