...
首页> 外文期刊>Annals of vascular surgery >Preoperative carotid duplex findings predict carotid stump pressures during endarterectomy in symptomatic but not asymptomatic patients.
【24h】

Preoperative carotid duplex findings predict carotid stump pressures during endarterectomy in symptomatic but not asymptomatic patients.

机译:术前颈动脉双工的发现可预测有症状但无症状的患者在动脉内膜切除术期间的颈动脉残端压力。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

BACKGROUND: Carotid stump pressure (CSP) is frequently measured to determine the need for shunt use during carotid endarterectomy (CEA). We hypothesized that the preoperative carotid duplex examination correlates with preoperative symptoms and intraoperative CSP. METHODS: Patients undergoing CEA over a 7-year period were identified from our vascular registry. CEA was performed with selective shunting on the basis of intraoperative CSP <30 mm Hg regardless of symptoms or contralateral internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis. The preoperative duplex was categorized by ipsilateral and contralateral ICA diameter-reduction stenosis (<15%, 15-45%, 45-70%, 70-99% [severe] and occluded), and the direction of vertebral artery flow. The relationships among preoperative duplex findings, symptom status, and CSP were evaluated using unpaired t-test and Chi-square analysis. RESULTS: A total of 303 CEAs were performed. Stump pressures were documented in 284 patients, which comprised the study population. Asymptomatic severe stenosis was the indication for CEA in 179 cases (59.1%). Symptomatic patients (Sx) had significantly lower stump pressures than asymptomatic (ASx) patients (40.72 +/- 16.27 vs. 45.8 +/- 17.64 mm Hg, p = 0.0167). Fifty-seven patients (19%) had contralateral severe ICA stenosis or occlusion. Contralateral ICA stenosis or occlusion had significantly lower CSP than those with lesser degrees of stenosis (39.24 +/- 15 vs. 44.82 +/- 17.62 mm Hg, p = 0.0267). Contralateral ICA severe stenosis or occlusion correlated with lower CSP in Sx patients (32.05 +/- 8.24 vs. 42.92 +/- 16.95 mm Hg, p = 0.038) but not in ASx patients (43.2 +/- 16 vs. 46.29 +/- 17.5 mm Hg, p = 0.39). CSP was <30 mm Hg in 63% of Sx patients and 24% of ASx patients (p = 0.012). Overall shunt usage was 84/2,842 (9.5%). Perioperative stroke and death rate was 2.7%. Perioperative stroke did not correlate with the presence of contralateral occlusion, or severity of contralateral stenosis. CONCLUSIONS: Symptomatic patients undergoing CEA have lower stump pressures than ASx patients overall and also in the presence of contralateral disease. The incidence of perioperative stroke was not predicted by severity of contralateral disease. A strategy of selective shunting seems appropriate even in Sx patients with contralateral severe stenosis or occlusion. Although a high-risk cohort for perioperative neurologic events exists and may include those with symptomatic disease and contralateral severe stenosis or occlusion, further study is warranted to define the patients who will clinically benefit from shunt placement.
机译:背景:经常测量颈动脉残端压力(CSP),以确定在颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)期间分流使用的需要。我们假设术前颈动脉双工检查与术前症状和术中CSP相关。方法:从我们的血管登记处确定7年以上接受CEA的患者。在术中CSP <30 mm Hg的基础上,无论症状或对侧颈内动脉(ICA)狭窄,都通过选择性分流进行CEA。术前双工根据同侧和对侧ICA直径缩小狭窄(<15%,15-45%,45-70%,70-99%[严重]和闭塞)和椎动脉血流的方向进行分类。术前双工发现,症状状态和CSP之间的关系使用未配对t检验和卡方分析进行评估。结果:共进行了303次CEA。记录了284名患者的残端压力,其中包括研究人群。无症状性严重狭窄是179例CEA的指征(59.1%)。有症状的患者(Sx)的树桩压明显低于无症状的患者(ASx)(40.72 +/- 16.27 mm vs.45.8 +/- 17.64 mm Hg,p = 0.0167)。五十七名患者(19%)患有对侧严重ICA狭窄或闭塞。对侧ICA狭窄或闭塞的CSP明显低于狭窄程度较小的患者(39.24 +/- 15 vs. 44.82 +/- 17.62 mm Hg,p = 0.0267)。对侧ICA严重狭窄或闭塞与Sx患者的CSP降低相关(32.05 +/- 8.24 vs. 42.92 +/- 16.95 mm Hg,p = 0.038),而在ASx患者中则不相关(43.2 +/- 16 vs. 46.29 +/- 17.5毫米汞柱,p = 0.39)。 63%的Sx患者和24%的ASx患者的CSP <30 mm Hg(p = 0.012)。分流器的总体使用率为84 / 2,842(9.5%)。围手术期中风和死亡率为2.7%。围手术期卒中与对侧阻塞的存在或对侧狭窄的严重程度无关。结论:有症状的接受CEA的患者的树桩压力总体上低于ASx患者,也存在对侧疾病。不能通过对侧疾病的严重程度预测围手术期中风的发生率。即使在对侧严重狭窄或闭塞的Sx患者中,选择性分流策略似乎也是合适的。尽管存在围手术期神经系统事件的高风险队列,并且可能包括那些有症状疾病和对侧严重狭窄或闭塞的队列,但仍需进一步研究确定哪些患者将从分流放置中受益。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号