首页> 外文期刊>Animal Feed Science and Technology >Chestnut and mimosa tannin silages: Effects in sheep differ for apparent digestibility, nitrogen utilisation and losses
【24h】

Chestnut and mimosa tannin silages: Effects in sheep differ for apparent digestibility, nitrogen utilisation and losses

机译:栗子和含羞草单宁青贮饲料:对绵羊的影响因表观消化率,氮素利用和损失而有所不同

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This paper reports effects of chestnut and mimosa tannins on N utilisation in sheep. Tannins were added to grass either at ensilage or incorporated into grass silage at feeding. The study used an 8c5 incomplete Latin Square design with eight mature wether sheep and five 21-day periods. Tannin additions reduced in vivo apparent digestibilities of dry matter (DM), organic matter (OM) and neutral detergent fibre (aNDFom) compared with the untreated control silage (P<0.001). Reductions ranged from 7.6% for DM to 8.5% for aNDFom. Chestnut compared to mimosa tannin silages produced higher values for DM intake (734g/day versus 625g/day) and in vivo digestibility for DM, OM and aNDFom (0.66, 0.68 and 0.69 versus 0.61, 0.63 and 0.62; P<0.001). A substantial shift occurred in the pattern of N excretion in sheep fed the tannin versus control silages. As a proportion of daily N intake, urinary N losses were lower (56.4g/100g N versus 65.1g/100g N intake) and faecal N losses were higher (40.2g/100g N versus 29.8g/100g N intake) for sheep fed the tannin silages compared with those fed the control grass silage (P<0.001). Nitrogen intake was higher in sheep fed the chestnut compared to mimosa tannin silages (16.2g/day versus 13.4g/day; P<0.001), reflecting the lower DM intake of sheep fed the mimosa silages. However, faecal N loss was lower for chestnut compared to mimosa tannin silage fed sheep (38.2g/100g N versus 42.1g/100g N intake; P<0.01), resulting in higher N retentions with the chestnut compared to the mimosa silage fed sheep (5.49g/100g N versus 1.38g/100g N intake). Faecal N losses were also higher when tannins were added during ensiling rather than at feeding (P<0.05). Although there was no overall effect of tannins on N retention in mature wether sheep, it is likely that productive ruminants with higher protein requirements would retain more N from silages containing chestnut tannins. Tannins added externally to grass silages may generate some benefits on N utilisation and environmental N excretions in sheep fed the silages.
机译:本文报道了栗子和含羞草单宁对绵羊氮素利用的影响。单宁在青贮饲料中添加到草料中,或在喂食时加入青贮饲料中。该研究使用了8c5不完整的拉丁方设计,其中包括八只成熟的绵羊和五个21天的周期。与未处理的对照青贮饲料相比,单宁的添加降低了干物质(DM),有机物质(OM)和中性洗涤剂纤维(aNDFom)的体内表观消化率(P <0.001)。减少幅度从DM的7.6%到aNDFom的8.5%不等。栗子与含羞草单宁青贮饲料相比,DM摄入量更高(分别为734g /天和625g /天)和DM,OM和aNDFom的体内消化率(0.66、0.68和0.69对0.61、0.63和0.62; P <0.001)。饲喂单宁和对照青贮饲料的绵羊的氮排泄模式发生了重大变化。按每日氮摄入量的比例,饲喂绵羊的尿中尿液氮损失较低(56.4g / 100g N对65.1g / 100g N摄入),而粪便氮损失较高(40.2g / 100g N对29.8g / 100g N摄入)与饲喂对照青贮饲料的单宁青贮饲料相比(P <0.001)。与含羞草单宁青贮饲料相比,饲喂栗子的绵羊的氮摄入量更高(分别为16.2g /天和13.4g /天; P <0.001),反映了饲喂含羞草青贮饲料的绵羊的DM摄入量较低。然而,与含羞草单宁青贮饲喂的绵羊相比,栗子的粪便氮损失较低(38.2g / 100g N对摄入的42.1g / 100g氮; P <0.01),与含羞草青贮饲喂的绵羊相比,栗子的粪便氮保留更高。 (5.49克/ 100克氮与1.38克/ 100克氮的摄入量)。在灌肠过程中而不是进食时添加单宁,粪便中氮的损失也较高(P <0.05)。尽管单宁对成熟的绵羊绵羊中的氮保留没有整体影响,但是蛋白质含量更高的反刍动物可能会从含有栗单宁的青贮饲料中保留更多的氮。从草料青贮饲料外部添加的单宁可能对饲喂青贮饲料的绵羊的氮素利用和环境氮排泄物产生一些益处。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号