首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Rural Studies >Exploring emergent practices in Alternative Food Networks: Voedselteams in Belgium
【24h】

Exploring emergent practices in Alternative Food Networks: Voedselteams in Belgium

机译:探索替代食品网络的紧急实践:比利时的voedselteams

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Current sustainability challenges in agro-food networks highlight the need for sustainability transitions in agrofood practices. This paper aims to contribute by analysing how emergent agro-food practices form and develop over time. Alternative Food Networks (AFNs) provide a locus to study how emergent agro-food practices are shaped and to understand the factors that influence how they develop over time. We take a social practices approach to study Voedselteams - a network of food buying groups in Belgium. We go beyond studying single practices, by analysing AFNs as consisting of bundles of practices. We use a mix of methods (desk-top study, structured and semi-structured interviews, participant observation and workshops). Our results show that becoming involved in an AFN may also mean getting involved in other 'alternative' practices. As such, engaging in an AFN may require more effort than gaining access to or provisioning food through more strongly routinised practices. Our results suggest that whether, and the extent to which, participants get involved in emergent practice-bundles depends on an interplay between their motivations and the ways in which the emergent practice-bundles are embedded in existing bundles of practices. The routinisation and professionalisation of alternative practices - more in line with existing practice bundles may facilitate the participation of members willing to invest less time and effort in gaining access to food through an AFN. This suggests that the routinisation and alignment with the bundles of practices that shape daily lives are crucial for emergent practices to appeal to a wider public.
机译:农业食品网络中当前的可持续性挑战突出了农业食品实践中可持续性转变的必要性。本文旨在通过分析紧急农业食品实践是如何形成和发展的来做出贡献。替代食品网络(AFN)提供了一个研究紧急农业食品实践是如何形成的,并了解影响它们如何随时间发展的因素的场所。我们采用社会实践的方法来研究Voedselteams——比利时的一个食品购买团体网络。我们不仅研究单一的实践,还将AFN分析为由多个实践组成。我们使用多种方法(桌面研究、结构化和半结构化访谈、参与者观察和研讨会)。我们的结果表明,参与AFN也可能意味着参与其他“替代”实践。因此,参与AFN可能需要比通过更严格的常规做法获取或供应食物更多的努力。我们的研究结果表明,参与者是否以及在多大程度上参与紧急实践包取决于他们的动机和紧急实践包嵌入现有实践包的方式之间的相互作用。替代实践的常规化和专业化——更符合现有实践捆绑包,可能有助于愿意投入更少时间和精力通过AFN获取食物的成员参与。这表明,常规化和与塑造日常生活的大量实践的一致性对于紧急实践吸引更广泛的公众至关重要。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号