...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of psychoeducational assessment >Dimensional Evaluation of Cognitive Measures: Methodological Confounds and Theoretical Concerns
【24h】

Dimensional Evaluation of Cognitive Measures: Methodological Confounds and Theoretical Concerns

机译:认知措施的尺寸评价:方法论混淆与理论态度

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The current study provides a methodological review of studies supporting a general factor of intelligence as the primary model for contemporary measures of cognitive abilities. A further evaluation is provided by an empirical evaluation that compares statistical estimates using different approaches in a large sample of children (ages 9–13 years, N = 780) administered a comprehensive battery of cognitive measures. Results from this study demonstrate the ramifications of using the bifactor and Schmid–Leiman (BF/SL) technique and suggest that using BF/SL methods limit interpretation of cognitive abilities to only a general factor. The inadvertent use of BF/SL methods is demonstrated to impact both model dimensionality and variance estimates for specific measures. As demonstrated in this study, conclusions from both exploratory and confirmatory studies using BF/SL methods are significantly questioned, especially for studies with a questionable theoretical basis. Guidelines for the interpretation of cognitive test scores in applied practice are discussed.
机译:目前的研究提供了一个方法学回顾,支持智力的一般因素作为当代认知能力测量的主要模型。一项实证评估提供了进一步的评估,该评估在一个大样本儿童(9-13岁,N=780)中比较了使用不同方法的统计估计,这些儿童接受了一系列全面的认知测量。这项研究的结果证明了使用双因子和施密德-莱曼(BF/SL)技术的后果,并表明使用BF/SL方法将认知能力的解释限制在一个一般因素上。无意中使用BF/SL方法会影响特定度量的模型维度和方差估计。如本研究所示,使用BF/SL方法进行的探索性和验证性研究得出的结论都受到了严重质疑,尤其是对于理论基础有问题的研究。讨论了应用实践中认知测试分数的解释指南。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号