首页> 外文学位 >Addressing confounding factors in the study of working memory in aphasia: Empirical evaluation of modified tasks and measures.
【24h】

Addressing confounding factors in the study of working memory in aphasia: Empirical evaluation of modified tasks and measures.

机译:解决失语症工作记忆研究中的混杂因素:修改后的任务和措施的经验评估。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Deficits in working memory are a critical subset of nonlinguistic impairments in aphasia. Previous studies indicated that individuals with aphasia made more errors on working memory tasks compared to individuals without cognitive or neurological impairments. Also, an association between working memory capacity and general language abilities in people with aphasia was demonstrated. Unfortunately, the study of working memory in aphasia is fraught with methodological limitations, thus reducing validity and generalization of findings. The goal of this current study was to reduce confounds associated with existing tasks and measures by developing working memory span tasks suited for individuals with aphasia and establishing the psychometric properties of associated performance measures.;Participants engaged in four working memory tasks. In the traditional listening span task, participants without aphasia listened to long compound sentences, verified their semantic plausibility, remembered a set of separately presented words, and then recalled them at the end of a sentence set. In the modified listening span task, participants heard sentences, pointed to an image within a multiple-choice display that best matched that sentence, and remembered a set of words for later recall. In the counting span task, participants counted the number of target shapes within each display and remembered the final tally for recall. In the eye-movement working memory task, participants' eye movements were monitored during presentation of verbal and visual stimuli. This was an eye-tracking version of the modified listening span task, with colors and symbols as items to be remembered.;Recall performance on all working memory tasks was significantly correlated. Significant differences in processing and storage scores emerged between participants with and without aphasia. No relationship was observed between storage scores and scores on a standardized aphasia language test. Results highlight a dissociation between working memory capacity and language abilities and underscore the importance of assessing working memory in people with aphasia as a construct distinct from linguistic abilities. Further study of the role of WM in aphasia is important for better understanding of the nonlinguistic aspects of aphasia, developing valid and reliable assessment methods, and providing optimal treatment while taking nonlinguistic factors into account.
机译:工作记忆不足是失语症非语言障碍的重要子集。先前的研究表明,与没有认知或神经功能障碍的人相比,失语症的人在工作记忆任务上犯了更多的错误。同样,失语症患者的工作记忆能力和一般语言能力之间存在关联。不幸的是,对失语症工作记忆的研究充满了方法学上的局限性,从而降低了有效性和结果的普遍性。本研究的目的是通过开发适合失语症患者的工作记忆跨度任务并建立相关绩效测量的心理计量学特性,以减少与现有任务和措施相关的混杂因素。参加四项工作记忆任务的参与者。在传统的听力跨度任务中,没有失语症的参与者听了很长的复合句子,验证了它们的语义合理性,记住了一组单独出现的单词,然后在句子集的末尾回忆了它们。在修改后的听力跨度任务中,参与者听到句子,指向多选显示中与该句子最匹配的图像,并记住一组单词供以后记忆。在计算跨度任务中,参与者对每个显示器中的目标形状进行了计数,并记住了最终召回的提示。在眼动工作记忆任务中,在呈现言语和视觉刺激过程中监控参与者的眼动。这是修改后的听力跨度任务的眼动追踪版本,其中颜色和符号作为要记住的项目。在所有工作记忆任务上的召回性能均显着相关。有和没有失语症的参与者之间在处理和存储评分上存在显着差异。在标准化的失语症语言测验中,储存分数和分数之间没有关系。结果强调了工作记忆能力和语言能力之间的分离,并强调了评估失语症患者的工作记忆的重要性,这是一种不同于语言能力的结构。进一步研究WM在失语症中的作用对于更好地理解失语症的非语言方面,开发有效且可靠的评估方法以及在考虑非语言因素的情况下提供最佳治疗至关重要。

著录项

  • 作者

    Ivanova, Maria V.;

  • 作者单位

    Ohio University.;

  • 授予单位 Ohio University.;
  • 学科 Biology Neuroscience.;Health Sciences Speech Pathology.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2009
  • 页码 222 p.
  • 总页数 222
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号