首页> 外文期刊>Journal of mass spectrometry: JMS >Evaluation of three sample preparation methods for the identification of clinical strains by using two MALDI-TOF MS systems
【24h】

Evaluation of three sample preparation methods for the identification of clinical strains by using two MALDI-TOF MS systems

机译:通过使用两种MALDI-TOF MS系统评估三种样品制备方法的鉴定临床菌株

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) has revolutionized the microbial identification, especially in the clinical microbiology laboratories. However, although numerous studies on the identification of microorganisms by MALDI-TOF MS have been reported previously, few studies focused on the effect of pretreatment on identification. Due to the sensitivity of MALDI-TOF MS, different preparation methods will lead to changes in microbial protein fingerprints. In this study, for evaluating a more appropriate preparation method for the clinical microbiology identification, we analyzed the performance of three sample preparation methods on two different MALDI-TOF MS systems. A total of 321 clinical isolates, 127 species, were employed in the comparative study of three different sample preparation methods including the direct colony transfer method (DCTM), the on-target extraction method (OTEM), and the in-tube extraction method (ITEM) compatible with MALDI-TOF MS. All isolates were tested on the Microflex LT and Autof ms1000 devices. The spectra were analyzed using the Bruker biotyper and the Autof ms1000 systems. The results were confirmed by 16/18S rRNA sequencing. Results reveal that the accuracies of isolates identification by Bruker biotyper successfully identified 83.8%, 96.0%, and 95.3% after performing the DCTM, OTEM, and ITEM, respectively, while the Autof ms1000 identified 97.5%, 100%, and 99.7%. These data suggested that the identification rates are comparable among the three preparation methods using the Autof ms1000 and Bruker microflex LT systems but the OTEM is more suitable and necessary for clinical application, owing to its key advantages of simplicity and accuracy.
机译:基质辅助激光解吸/电离飞行时间质谱(MALDI-TOF MS)已彻底改变了微生物鉴定,尤其是在临床微生物学实验室。然而,尽管之前已有大量关于MALDI-TOF MS鉴定微生物的研究报道,但很少有研究集中于预处理对鉴定的影响。由于MALDI-TOF MS的敏感性,不同的制备方法会导致微生物蛋白质指纹图谱的变化。在本研究中,为了评估更适合临床微生物鉴定的制备方法,我们分析了三种样品制备方法在两种不同MALDI-TOF MS系统上的性能。共有321株127种临床分离株用于三种不同样品制备方法的比较研究,包括直接菌落转移法(DCTM)、靶向提取法(OTEM)和与MALDI-TOF MS兼容的管内提取法(ITEM)。所有分离株均在Microflex LT和Autof ms1000设备上进行了测试。使用Bruker biotyper和Autof ms1000系统分析光谱。结果经16/18srrna测序证实。结果表明,在执行DCTM、OTEM和ITEM后,Bruker biotyper的分离株鉴定准确率分别为83.8%、96.0%和95.3%,而Autof ms1000的鉴定准确率分别为97.5%、100%和99.7%。这些数据表明,在使用Autof ms1000和Bruker microflex LT系统的三种制备方法中,识别率是可比的,但OTEM由于其简单和准确的关键优势,更适合和有必要用于临床应用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号