首页> 外文期刊>Journal of intensive care medicine >Adverse Hemodynamic Events Associated With Concomitant Dexmedetomidine and Propofol for Sedation in Mechanically Ventilated ICU Patients
【24h】

Adverse Hemodynamic Events Associated With Concomitant Dexmedetomidine and Propofol for Sedation in Mechanically Ventilated ICU Patients

机译:与伴随的右甲酰嘌呤和异丙酚相关的不良血液动力学事件在机械通风ICU患者中镇静

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose: Nonbenzodiazepines are preferred for continuous sedation in mechanically ventilated intensive care unit (ICU) patients. Although dexmedetomidine and propofol have blood pressure lowering properties, limited data exist about the hemodynamic effects of concomitant administration. The purpose of this study was to compare the adverse hemodynamic event rate with concomitant dexmedetomidine and propofol compared to either agent alone in mechanically ventilated ICU patients. Methods: This retrospective cohort study was conducted at a university medical center. Adult ICU patients (>= 18 years) admitted between October 20, 2015, and January 25, 2018, and administered concurrent dexmedetomidine and propofol or either agent alone for >= 24 hours were included. Mean arterial pressure, heart rate, and sedative dosing requirements were assessed from initiation to 72 hours after initiation. The primary end point was comparing the incidence of hypotension among study groups. Secondary aims compared the incidence of tachycardia and bradycardia as well as clinical outcomes. Results: Overall, 276 patients were included among combination (n = 93), dexmedetomidine (n = 91), and propofol (n = 92) groups. The incidence of hypotension was significantly higher in patients administered concomitant dexmedetomidine and propofol (62.4%) compared to those administered dexmedetomidine (23.1%) or propofol (23.9%) alone (P < .0001). Adjunctive dexmedetomidine with propofol was also associated with higher rates of clinically relevant hypotension requiring treatment (P = .048). The tachycardia incidence in the concomitant, dexmedetomidine, and propofol groups were 30.1%, 28.6%, and 14.1%, respectively (P = 02). Only 1.4% (n = 4) of all study patients developed bradycardia. Concomitant therapy was an independent risk factor of hypotension compared to either dexmedetomidine (odds ratio [OR]: 6.7, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.61-17.3, P < .0001) or propofol (OR: 2.89, 95% CI: 1.24-6.74, P = .014) monotherapy. Patients experiencing hypotension were associated with worse clinical outcomes. Conclusion: Concomitant dexmedetomidine and propofol use in mechanically ventilated patients increased the risk of hypotensive events. Adjunctive dexmedetomidine with propofol administration in the critically ill warrants caution.
机译:目的:非苯二氮卓类药物是机械通气重症监护病房(ICU)患者持续镇静的首选药物。虽然右美托咪定和异丙酚具有降压特性,但关于同时服用的血流动力学效应的数据有限。本研究的目的是比较机械通气ICU患者同时使用右美托咪定和异丙酚与单独使用这两种药物的不良血流动力学事件发生率。方法:这项回顾性队列研究在一所大学医学中心进行。包括2015年10月20日至2018年1月25日期间入院的成人ICU患者(>=18岁),同时服用右美托咪定和异丙酚,或单用任何一种药物>=24小时。从开始到开始后72小时,评估平均动脉压、心率和镇静剂剂量需求。主要终点是比较研究组之间低血压的发生率。次要目的是比较心动过速和心动过缓的发生率以及临床结果。结果:总体而言,276名患者被纳入联合用药组(n=93)、右美托咪定组(n=91)和异丙酚组(n=92)。与单独使用右美托咪定(23.1%)或异丙酚(23.9%)的患者相比,同时使用右美托咪定和异丙酚(62.4%)的患者的低血压发生率显著更高(P<0.0001)。右美托咪定联合异丙酚辅助治疗也与需要治疗的临床相关低血压发生率较高有关(P=0.048)。联合用药组、右美托咪定组和异丙酚组的心动过速发生率分别为30.1%、28.6%和14.1%(P=02)。所有研究患者中只有1.4%(n=4)出现心动过缓。与右美托咪定(优势比[OR]:6.7,95%可信区间[CI]:2.61-17.3,P<0.0001)或异丙酚(OR:2.89,95%可信区间:1.24-6.74,P=0.014)单一疗法相比,联合治疗是低血压的独立危险因素。低血压患者的临床预后较差。结论:机械通气患者同时使用右美托咪定和异丙酚会增加低血压事件的风险。危重患者需谨慎使用右旋美托咪定和异丙酚。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号