首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Insect Conservation >Sampling bees in tropical forests and agroecosystems: a review
【24h】

Sampling bees in tropical forests and agroecosystems: a review

机译:在热带森林和农业科学系统中的抽样蜜蜂:审查

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Bees are the predominant pollinating taxa, providing a critical ecosystem service upon which many angiosperms rely for successful reproduction. Available data suggests that bee populations worldwide are declining, but scarce data in tropical regions precludes assessing their status and distribution, impact on ecological services, and response to management actions. Herein, we reviewed > 150 papers that used six common sampling methods (pan traps, baits, Malaise traps, sweep nets, timed observations and aspirators) to better understand their strengths and weaknesses, and help guide method selection to meet research objectives and development of multi-species monitoring approaches. Several studies evaluated the effectiveness of sweep nets, pan traps, and malaise traps, but only one evaluated timed observations, and none evaluated aspirators. Only five studies compared two or more of the remaining four sampling methods to each other. There was little consensus regarding which method would be most reliable for sampling multiple species. However, we recommend that if the objective of the study is to estimate abundance or species richness, malaise traps, pan traps and sweep nets are the most effective sampling protocols in open tropical systems; conversely, malaise traps, nets and baits may be the most effective in forests. Declining bee populations emphasize the critical need in method standardization and reporting precision. Moreover, we recommend reporting a catchability coefficient, a measure of the interaction between the resource (bee) abundance and catching effort. Melittologists could also consider existing methods, such as occupancy models, to quantify changes in distribution and abundance after modeling heterogeneity in trapping probability, and consider the possibility of developing monitoring frameworks that draw from multiple sources of data.
机译:蜜蜂是主要的授粉类群,为许多被子植物的成功繁殖提供了关键的生态系统服务。现有数据表明,世界范围内的蜜蜂数量正在下降,但热带地区缺乏数据,无法评估蜜蜂的地位和分布、对生态服务的影响以及对管理行动的反应。在此,我们回顾了超过150篇论文,这些论文使用了六种常见的采样方法(诱捕器、诱饵、不适诱捕器、扫网、定时观察和抽吸器),以更好地了解它们的优缺点,并帮助指导方法选择,以满足研究目标和多物种监测方法的发展。有几项研究评估了清扫网、pan陷阱和不适陷阱的有效性,但只有一项评估了定时观察,没有一项评估了吸引器。只有五项研究对其余四种抽样方法中的两种或两种以上进行了比较。对于哪种方法对多个物种的取样最可靠,几乎没有共识。然而,我们建议,如果研究的目的是估算丰度或物种丰富度,在开放的热带系统中,不适陷阱、泛陷阱和扫网是最有效的采样方案;相反,在森林中,不适诱捕器、网和诱饵可能是最有效的。蜜蜂数量的减少强调了方法标准化和报告精度的关键需求。此外,我们建议报告可捕性系数,这是一种衡量资源(蜜蜂)丰度和捕集努力之间相互作用的指标。蜂毒学家也可以考虑现有的方法,如占用模型,量化分布和丰度变化后,建模异质性捕获概率,并考虑发展的可能性,从多个数据源的监测框架。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号