...
首页> 外文期刊>Annals of the American Thoracic Society >Comparison between an Alternative and the Classic Definition of Chronic Bronchitis in COPDGene
【24h】

Comparison between an Alternative and the Classic Definition of Chronic Bronchitis in COPDGene

机译:COPD基因中慢性支气管炎的替代定义与经典定义的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Rationale: Previous studies on chronic bronchitis (CB) have used varying definitions.Objectives: We sought to compare an alternative CB definition, using the St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ), a commonly used assessment tool, with the classic definition and to investigate if it had independent or additive value.Methods: We analyzed data from 4,513 subjects from Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease groups 1 to 4 in the COPDGene cohort. We compared the classic definition of CB with the SGRQ definition, defined by their answers to the questions about both cough and phlegm. We compared the Classic CB+ versus CB- groups, and the SGRQ CB+ and CB-groups. We also analyzed the cohort split into four groups: Classic CB+/SGRQ CB+, Classic CB+/SGRQ CB-, Classic CB-/SGRQ CB+, Classic CB-/SGRQ CB-.
机译:理由:先前对慢性支气管炎(CB)的研究使用了不同的定义。目标:我们试图使用常用的评估工具圣乔治呼吸问卷(SGRQ)与经典定义进行比较,以比较另一种CB定义,并进行调查方法:我们分析了慢性阻塞性肺疾病全球倡议的1到4组慢性阻塞性肺疾病全球行动计划的4,513名受试者的数据。我们将CB的经典定义与SGRQ定义进行了比较,SGRQ定义是由他们对咳嗽和痰液问题的回答所定义的。我们比较了经典CB +组和CB-组,以及SGRQ CB +和CB-组。我们还分析了分为四类的同类群组:经典CB + / SGRQ CB +,经典CB + / SGRQ CB-,经典CB- / SGRQ CB +,经典CB- / SGRQ CB-。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号