首页> 外文期刊>Blood Pressure Monitoring >White coat effect and white coat hypertension in community pharmacy practice.
【24h】

White coat effect and white coat hypertension in community pharmacy practice.

机译:社区药房实践中的白大褂效应和白大褂高血压。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present study was to investigate whether a white coat effect (WCE) can be observed and quantified in community pharmacy practice. METHODS: In five community pharmacies of Basel, Switzerland, clients asking for blood pressure (BP) measurement were recruited to participate in a free of charge study. Blood pressure was measured in four different settings: pharmacy (using mercury sphygmomanometers), outpatient clinic (measurement by a nurse using mercury sphygmomanometers), self-measurement at home (using automated wrist devices) and daytime ambulatory BP (ABP) monitoring (using SpaceLabs 90207 monitors). WCE was defined as the difference between pharmacy or outpatient and daytime ABP. RESULTS: A total of 50 subjects completed all measurements (42% male, mean age 53.7 years+/-14.0). Blood pressure values of the different settings: (means in mmHg+/-SD, systolic; diastolic): pharmacy BP 129+/-19; 82+/-10, outpatient clinic BP 127+/-15; 82+/-10, home BP 119+/-15; 73+/-9, daytime ABP 124+/-10; 79+/-8. Pharmacy BP was significantly higher (P=0.03 systolic; P=0.02 diastolic) compared with daytime ABP and differences among subjects with antihypertensive medication (n=22) were even more significant (P<0.01). Individual differences were found between pharmacy BP and daytime ABP: +4.6+/-14.8; +2.9+/-8.3. Outpatient BP was significantly higher compared with daytime ABP in diastolic (P=0.04) but not in systolic values. Individual differences between outpatient BP and daytime ABP were +2.5+/-13.1; +2.8+/-9.2. 'Clinically important WCE' (>/=20 mmHg systolic or >/=10 mmHg diastolic) was observed in 24% of all subjects in the pharmacy and in 20% in the outpatient clinic. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings show that WCE and white coat hypertension exist in community pharmacy practice and are similar to the effects in an outpatient clinic.
机译:目的:本研究的目的是调查社区药房实践中是否可以观察和量化白大衣效应(WCE)。方法:在瑞士巴塞尔的5家社区药房中,招募了要求进行血压(BP)测量的客户以参加免费研究。在四种不同的环境中测量血压:药房(使用汞血压计),门诊(通过护士使用汞血压计进行测量),在家中进行自我测量(使用自动手腕装置)和日间动态血压(ABP)监测(使用SpaceLabs) 90207显示器)。 WCE被定义为药房或门诊患者与白天ABP之间的差异。结果:总共50名受试者完成了所有测量(男性42%,平均年龄53.7岁+/- 14.0)。不同设置的血压值:(平均值为mmHg +/- SD,收缩压;舒张压):药房BP 129 +/- 19; 82 +/- 10,门诊BP 127 +/- 15; 82 +/- 10,家用血压119 +/- 15; 73 +/- 9,白天ABP 124 +/- 10; 79 +/- 8。与白天的ABP相比,药房BP显着更高(P = 0.03收缩压; P = 0.02舒张压),而服用降压药的受试者之间的差异(n = 22)甚至更为显着(P <0.01)。在药房BP和日间ABP之间发现个体差异:+4.6 +/- 14.8; +2.9 +/- 8.3。与白天ABP相比,门诊患者的舒张压明显高于白天(P = 0.04),但收缩压没有升高。门诊血压和日间血压之间的个体差异为+2.5 +/- 13.1; +2.8 +/- 9.2。在药房所有受试者中有24%在门诊患者中观察到“临床上重要的WCE”(收缩压≥20 mmHg或舒张压≥10 mmHg)。结论:我们的研究结果表明,社区药房实践中存在WCE和白大衣高血压,并且与门诊诊所的效果相似。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号