...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning >Handling uncertainty through adaptiveness in planning approaches: comparing adaptive delta management and the water diplomacy framework
【24h】

Handling uncertainty through adaptiveness in planning approaches: comparing adaptive delta management and the water diplomacy framework

机译:通过规划方法的适应性来处理不确定性:相比,适应三角洲管理和水外交框架

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Planners and water managers seek to be adaptive to handle uncertainty through the use of planning approaches. In this paper, we study what type of adaptiveness is proposed and how this may be operationalized in planning approaches to adequately handle different uncertainties. We took a comparative case study approach to study two planning approaches: the water diplomacy framework (WDF) and adaptive delta management (ADM). We found that the approaches differ in their conceptualization of uncertainty and show that different types of adaptiveness are used in the approaches. While WDF builds on collaborative adaptive management as a set of ongoing adjustments and continuous learning to handle uncertainty, ADM deliberately attempts to anticipate future adaptations through a set of tools which allows for seizing opportunities and avoiding lock-in and lock-out mechanisms. We conclude that neither of the approaches is fully able to account for different uncertainties. Both approaches may benefit from specific insights in what uncertainty and adaptiveness entail for the development of water management plans.
机译:规划者和水资源管理者试图通过使用规划方法来适应不确定性。在本文中,我们研究提出了什么类型的适应性,以及如何在规划方法中操作,以充分处理不同的不确定性。我们采用比较案例研究方法研究了两种规划方法:水外交框架(WDF)和适应性三角洲管理(ADM)。我们发现,这些方法在不确定性的概念化上有所不同,并表明在这些方法中使用了不同类型的适应性。虽然WDF建立在协作适应性管理的基础上,作为一套持续调整和持续学习来处理不确定性,但ADM有意尝试通过一套工具来预测未来的适应性,这些工具允许抓住机会,避免锁定和锁定机制。我们得出结论,这两种方法都不能完全解释不同的不确定性。这两种方法都可能受益于对水管理计划制定过程中的不确定性和适应性的具体洞察。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号