...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning >Handling uncertainty through adaptiveness in planning approaches: comparing adaptive delta management and the water diplomacy framework
【24h】

Handling uncertainty through adaptiveness in planning approaches: comparing adaptive delta management and the water diplomacy framework

机译:通过规划方法的适应性来处理不确定性:相比,适应三角洲管理和水外交框架

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Planners and water managers seek to be adaptive to handle uncertainty through the use of planning approaches. In this paper, we study what type of adaptiveness is proposed and how this may be operationalized in planning approaches to adequately handle different uncertainties. We took a comparative case study approach to study two planning approaches: the water diplomacy framework (WDF) and adaptive delta management (ADM). We found that the approaches differ in their conceptualization of uncertainty and show that different types of adaptiveness are used in the approaches. While WDF builds on collaborative adaptive management as a set of ongoing adjustments and continuous learning to handle uncertainty, ADM deliberately attempts to anticipate future adaptations through a set of tools which allows for seizing opportunities and avoiding lock-in and lock-out mechanisms. We conclude that neither of the approaches is fully able to account for different uncertainties. Both approaches may benefit from specific insights in what uncertainty and adaptiveness entail for the development of water management plans.
机译:策划者和水管理人员寻求适应通过使用规划方法来处理不确定性。在本文中,我们研究了提出了什么类型的适应性以及如何在规划方法中运行,以充分处理不同的不确定性。我们采取了比较案例研究方法来研究两种规划方法:水外交框架(WDF)和Adaptive Delta Management(Adm)。我们发现,这种方法在他们对不确定性的概念化方面不同,并显示了这种方法使用不同类型的适应性。虽然WDF在协作适应管理中建立了一套持续的调整和连续学习以处理不确定性,但是ADM故意尝试通过一系列工具预测未来的适应,允许抓住机会和避免锁定和锁定机制。我们得出结论,这些方法都没有完全能够考虑不同的不确定性。两种方法可能会受益于特定的见解,以便不确定性和适应性需要进行水管理计划的发展。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号