首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Agrarian Change >Experiments in farmers' collectives in Eastern India and Nepal: Process, benefits, and challenges
【24h】

Experiments in farmers' collectives in Eastern India and Nepal: Process, benefits, and challenges

机译:在印度东部和尼泊尔的农民集体中的实验:流程,福利和挑战

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Do farmers' collectives, which pool land, labour, capital, and skills to create medium-sized production units, offer a more viable model of farming for resource-constrained smallholders than individual family farms? A participatory action research project in Eastern India and Nepal provides notable answers. Groups of marginal and tenant farmers, catalysed by the project, evolved into four different collective models with varying levels of cooperation, gender composition, and land ownership/tenancy status. Based on 3 years of action research, this paper examines how the models evolved and their differential outcomes. All groups have gained from cultivating contiguous plots in their efficiency of labour and machine use for land preparation and irrigation, and from economies in input purchase. Several collectives of tenant farmers have also enhanced their bargaining power vis-a-vis an entrenched landlord class and thus been able to negotiate lower rents and refuse long-standing feudal obligations. However, the models differ in their extent of economic gain and their ability to handle gender inequalities and conflicts over labour sharing. The paper explores the historical, regional, and cultural factors that could explain such differences across the models. It thus offers unique insights into the processes, benefits, and challenges of farmers' collectives and provides pointers for replication and further research.
机译:将土地、劳动力、资本和技能集中起来以创建中型生产单元的农民集体,是否为资源受限的小农提供了比单个家庭农场更可行的农业模式?印度东部和尼泊尔的一个参与性行动研究项目提供了显著的答案。在该项目的推动下,边缘农民和佃农群体演变为四种不同的集体模式,合作程度、性别构成和土地所有权/租赁地位各不相同。基于三年的行动研究,本文探讨了这些模型是如何演变的及其不同的结果。所有群体都从连片土地的耕种、土地整理和灌溉的劳动力和机器使用效率以及投入购买的经济中获益。一些佃农集体也增强了他们与根深蒂固的地主阶级的谈判能力,因此能够谈判降低租金,拒绝长期的封建义务。然而,这些模式在经济收益的程度以及处理性别不平等和劳动分享冲突的能力上有所不同。本文探讨了历史、地区和文化因素,这些因素可以解释模型之间的差异。因此,它为农民集体的过程、利益和挑战提供了独特的见解,并为复制和进一步研究提供了指针。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号