...
首页> 外文期刊>Annals of oncology: official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology >Randomized controlled trials in the era of molecular oncology: Methodology, biomarkers, and end points
【24h】

Randomized controlled trials in the era of molecular oncology: Methodology, biomarkers, and end points

机译:分子肿瘤学时代的随机对照试验:方法论,生物标志物和终点

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: We previously reported metrics of systemic therapy randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in breast cancer, colorectal cancer (CRC), and non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) published 1975-2004. To evaluate trends in the era of targeted therapies (TT), we have repeated a similar analysis of RCTs published 2005-2009. Methods: A search for phase III RCTs of systemic agents published in five major journals 2005-2009 was carried out. Trials were classified as TT if they involved any non-hormonal targeted agent. We extracted data regarding biomarker use. Integral biomarkers were defined as tests used to determine eligibility, stratification, or allocation. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze trends over time. Results: One hundred and thirty-seven eligible RCTs were evaluated. Compared with 1995-2004, the number (17-27 RCTs/year) and size (median sample size 446-722, P < 0.001) of RCTs increased. The proportion of RCTs evaluating TT increased from 4% (7/167) to 29% (40/137) (P < 0.001). There was an increase in the proportion of trials with financial support from industry [57% (95/167) to 78% (107/137), P = 0.001]. Biomarkers were included in 58% (80/137) of RCTs; integral biomarkers were included in 36% (49/137) of trials. Among the 49 RCTs using integral biomarkers, 40 (82%) used HER2 and/or ER/PR status in studies of breast cancer. Conclusions: RCTs published in 2005-2009 are larger, more likely to evaluate TT, and be supported by industry. Biomarkers may be increasingly used, but the most common use relates to traditional use of ER/PR and evolving use of HER2 in breast cancer RCTs.
机译:背景:我们先前报道了1975-2004年发表的关于乳腺癌,大肠癌(CRC)和非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的全身治疗随机对照试验(RCT)的指标。为了评估靶向治疗(TT)时代的趋势,我们对2005-2009年发表的RCT进行了类似的分析。方法:对2005-2009年发表在五种主要期刊上的全身性药物的III期RCT进行搜索。如果试验涉及任何非激素靶向药物,则分类为TT。我们提取了有关生物标志物使用的数据。整体生物标志物定义为用于确定资格,分层或分配的测试。描述性统计数据用于分析一段时间内的趋势。结果:评估了137个符合条件的随机对照试验。与1995-2004年相比,RCT的数量(17-27个RCT /年)和数量(中位样本量446-722,P <0.001)有所增加。评估TT的RCT比例从4%(7/167)增加到29%(40/137)(P <0.001)。来自行业的资金支持的试验比例有所增加[57%(95/167)增至78%(107/137),P = 0.001]。 58%(80/137)的RCT中包括生物标志物; 36%(49/137)的试验中包括完整的生物标志物。在49个使用完整生物标志物的RCT中,有40个(82%)在乳腺癌研究中使用了HER2和/或ER / PR状态。结论:2005-2009年发布的RCT更大,更可能评估TT,并且得到了行业的支持。生物标志物的使用可能会越来越多,但最常见的用途涉及ER / PR的传统用途以及乳腺癌RCT中HER2的不断使用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号