首页> 外文期刊>Annals of oncology: official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology >A randomized phase II trial of doxorubicin plus pemetrexed followed by docetaxel versus doxorubicin plus cyclophosphamide followed by docetaxel as neoadjuvant treatment of early breast cancer.
【24h】

A randomized phase II trial of doxorubicin plus pemetrexed followed by docetaxel versus doxorubicin plus cyclophosphamide followed by docetaxel as neoadjuvant treatment of early breast cancer.

机译:阿霉素加培美曲塞联合多西紫杉醇与阿霉素加环磷酰胺联合多西紫杉醇联合多西紫杉醇作为早期乳腺癌的新辅助治疗的随机II期试验。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NST) before surgery is a standard option for patients with early breast cancer (EBC) that allows in vivo chemosensitivity testing. Given the promising activity of pemetrexed plus doxorubicin in metastatic breast cancer, it was reasonable to evaluate the utility of this combination as part of an NST regimen in EBC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with untreated operable T2-T4a-c N0-2 M0 breast cancer were randomly assigned to receive either four cycles of pemetrexed 500 mg/m(2) plus doxorubicin 60 mg/m(2) every 3 weeks (q3w) followed by four cycles of docetaxel 100 mg/m(2) q3w (AP-D) or four cycles of doxorubicin 60 mg/m(2) plus cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m(2) q3w followed by four cycles of docetaxel 100 mg/m(2) q3w (AC-D). Surgery was carried out within 2 months after last chemotherapy. Primary end point was pathological complete response (pCR) rate in the breast. Secondary end points included clinical response rate, rate of histologically negative axillary lymph nodes, toxicity, and disease-free survival. RESULTS: From September 2005 to August 2007, 257 patients were randomly allocated to 17 sites. Median age was 48 and 49 years for AP-D and AC-D, respectively. Overall pCR rates were 16.5% for AP-D and 20.2% for AC-D. With AP-D, pCR rate was 17.8% for hormone receptor (HR)-negative patients and 15.9% for HR-positive patients. With AC-D, pCR rates were 42.9% and 7.8% for HR-negative and HR-positive patients, respectively. Clinical response rates were 59.5% in the AP-D group and 68.1% in the AC-D group. The rate of histologically negative axillary lymph nodes was 53% in both groups. Both treatments were well tolerated. Median disease-free survival is currently not mature. CONCLUSIONS: AP-D and AC-D are well tolerated and active as NST in EBC. Of note, AC-D had a higher pCR rate in HR-negative tumors, whereas AP-D had more activity if HRs were expressed.
机译:背景:术前新辅助系统治疗(NST)是早期乳腺癌(EBC)患者的标准选择,可以进行体内化学敏感性测试。鉴于培美曲塞加阿霉素在转移性乳腺癌中的应用前景看好,因此有理由评估这种组合作为EBC中NST方案一部分的效用。患者和方法:未经治疗的可手术治疗的T2-T4a-c N0-2 M0乳腺癌患者被随机分配为每3周接受四轮培美曲塞500 mg / m(2)加阿霉素60 mg / m(2)(q3w ),然后四轮多西紫杉醇100 mg / m(2)q3w(AP-D)或四轮阿霉素60 mg / m(2)加环磷酰胺600 mg / m(2)q3w四轮,然后四轮多西紫杉醇100 mg / m(2)q3w(AC-D)。上次化疗后2个月内进行了手术。主要终点是乳腺的病理完全缓解率。次要终点包括临床反应率,组织学上阴性的腋窝淋巴结转移率,毒性和无病生存期。结果:从2005年9月到2007年8月,有257名患者被随机分配到17个地点。 AP-D和AC-D的中位年龄分别为48岁和49岁。 AP-D的总体pCR率为16.5%,AC-D的总体为20.2%。使用AP-D,激素受体(HR)阴性患者的pCR率为17.8%,而HR阳性患者的pCR率为15.9%。使用AC-D时,HR阴性和HR阳性患者的pCR率分别为42.9%和7.8%。 AP-D组的临床缓解率为59.5%,AC-D组的为68.1%。两组腋窝淋巴结的组织学阴性率为53%。两种治疗均耐受良好。目前无病生存中位数尚不成熟。结论:AP-D和AC-D具有良好的耐受性,并在EBC中作为NST起作用。值得注意的是,AC-D在HR阴性肿瘤中具有较高的pCR率,而AP-D在表达HR时具有更高的活性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号