...
首页> 外文期刊>Annals of oncology: official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology >Randomized phase II study of irinotecan, leucovorin and 5-fluorouracil (ILF) versus cisplatin plus ILF (PILF) combination chemotherapy for advanced gastric cancer.
【24h】

Randomized phase II study of irinotecan, leucovorin and 5-fluorouracil (ILF) versus cisplatin plus ILF (PILF) combination chemotherapy for advanced gastric cancer.

机译:伊立替康,亚叶酸钙和5-氟尿嘧啶(ILF)与顺铂加ILF(PILF)联合化疗治疗晚期胃癌的随机II期研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

BACKGROUND: Irinotecan, in combination with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) or cisplatin, has demonstrated efficacy against advanced gastric cancer (AGC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Chemotherapy-naive AGC patients were randomly assigned to receive irinotecan 150 mg/m(2) on day 1, leucovorin 20 mg/m(2) and a 22-h infusion of 5-FU 1000 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 2 (ILF) or ILF plus cisplatin 30 mg/m(2) on day 2 (PILF). Treatment was repeated every 2 weeks. RESULTS: Of 91 registered patients, 45 patients were treated with ILF and 45 with PILF. For both arms, 687 chemotherapy cycles were delivered (median = 7 for ILF and 8 for PILF). Both ILF and PILF were generally well tolerated and there was no relevant difference in the occurrence of overall grade 3/4 toxic effects between the two arms. Four patients died during treatment: one in the ILF and three in the PILF arm. The objective response rate was 42% for both arms. There was no significant difference in therapeutic efficacy between ILF and PILF with respect to progression-free survival (4.8 versus 6.2 months; P = 0.523) and overall survival (10.7 versus 10.5 months; P = 0.850). CONCLUSION: Both ILF and PILF are active as first-line chemotherapy for AGC. The addition of cisplatin, however, has no clear advantage over ILF.
机译:背景:伊立替康与5-氟尿嘧啶(5-FU)或顺铂联合使用已显示出抗晚期胃癌(AGC)的功效。患者和方法:未经化疗的AGC患者在第1天随机分配接受伊立替康150 mg / m(2),亚叶酸20 mg / m(2)和22-h输注5-FU 1000 mg / m(2) )在第1和2天(ILF)或在第二天(PILF)服用ILF加顺铂30 mg / m(2)。每2周重复治疗一次。结果:在91名注册患者中,有45例接受了ILF治疗,有45例接受了PILF治疗。双方共进行了687个化疗周期(ILF中位数= 7,PILF中位数= 8)。通常,ILF和PILF的耐受性都很好,并且两个手臂之间发生的整体3/4级毒性作用没有相关的差异。在治疗过程中有四名患者死亡:一名在ILF中死亡,三名在PILF组中死亡。两组的客观反应率为42%。在无进展生存期(4.8 vs 6.2个月; P = 0.523)和总生存期(10.7 vs 10.5个月; P = 0.850)方面,ILF和PILF的疗效没有显着差异。结论:ILF和PILF都可以作为AGC的一线化疗药物。但是,与ILF相比,顺铂的添加没有明显的优势。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号