...
首页> 外文期刊>Annals of oncology: official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology >Addition of either irinotecan or methotrexate to bolus 5-fluorouracil and high-dose folinic acid every 2 weeks in advanced colorectal carcinoma: a randomised study by the Southern Italy Cooperative Oncology Group.
【24h】

Addition of either irinotecan or methotrexate to bolus 5-fluorouracil and high-dose folinic acid every 2 weeks in advanced colorectal carcinoma: a randomised study by the Southern Italy Cooperative Oncology Group.

机译:在晚期结直肠癌中,每两周向大剂量5-氟尿嘧啶和大剂量亚叶酸中加用伊立替康或甲氨蝶呤:意大利南部合作肿瘤小组进行的一项随机研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare the activity and toxicity of the combination of irinotecan (IRI) plus folinic acid (FA)-modulated 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) i.v. bolus with a regimen of double modulation of 5-FU with methotrexate (MTX) and FA in patients with advanced colorectal carcinoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Two-hundred and thirty-four patients were enrolled: 118 patients received IRI 200 mg/m2 (90-min i.v. infusion) on day 1, followed by levo-FA 250 mg/m2 (2-h i.v. infusion) and 5-FU 850 mg/m2 (i.v. bolus) on day 2 (IRIFAFU), and 116 patients received MTX 750 mg/m2 (2-h i.v. infusion) on day 1, followed by levo-FA 250 mg/m2 (2-h i.v. infusion) and FU 800 mg/m2 (i.v. bolus) on day 2 (MTXFAFU). Both cycles were repeated every 2 weeks until progression or to a maximum of 16 cycles. Response rate (RR) was the main end point of the study; responses were assessed every four cycles and confirmed after 2 additional months of treatment. RESULTS: RR was significantly greater with IRIFAFU (36%) than with MTXFAFU (20%) (P <0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that IRIFAFU was significantly associated with a greater activity (P = 0.028). Median progression-free survival was longer with IRIFAFU than with MTXFAFU (7.2 months compared with 4.8 months; P = 0.048). Median survival time (MST) did not differ between the two arms (14.7 months compared with 14.8 months, respectively). Patients not receiving second-line chemotherapy, however, lived longer when treated in the first-line with IRIFAFU (MST 11.9 months compared with 6.4 months; P = 0.038). IRIFAFU caused a significantly greater occurrence of grade 3 or 4 neutropenia (40% compared with 9%; P = 0.001) and diarrhoea (13% compared with 4%; P = 0.024), but a significantly lower incidence of stomatitis (3% compared with 12%; P = 0.007), than the comparative regimen. CONCLUSIONS: IRIFAFU appeared comparable in terms of activity and toxicity with other weekly or biweekly bolus or infusional combination regimens. IRIFAFU, however, seems easier to administer, because it does not require infusional catheter or pump devices, and it is less expensive. It may represent a new option for treating advanced colorectal carcinoma.
机译:目的:本研究的目的是比较伊立替康(IRI)与亚叶酸(FA)调节的5-氟尿嘧啶(5-FU)静脉内联合使用的活性和毒性。在晚期大肠癌患者中使用5-FU与甲氨蝶呤(MTX)和FA双重调节的快速推注。患者和方法:234例患者入组:118例患者在第1天接受IRI 200 mg / m2(静脉输注90分钟),然后接受左旋FA 250 mg / m2(2 h静脉输注)和第2天(IRIFAFU)的5-FU 850 mg / m2(静脉推注),第1天有116例患者接受了MTX 750 mg / m2(静脉输注2h),随后是levo-FA 250 mg / m2(2 -h iv输注)和第2天(MTXFAFU)FU 800 mg / m2(iv推注)。这两个周期每2周重复一次,直到进展或最多16个周期为止。缓解率(RR)是研究的主要终点。每四个周期评估反应,并在治疗另外2个月后确认反应。结果:IRIFAFU(36%)的RR明显高于MTXFAFU(20%)(P <0.001)。多变量分析表明,IRIFAFU与更高的活性显着相关(P = 0.028)。 IRIFAFU的中位无进展生存期比MTXFAFU更长(7.2个月比4.8个月; P = 0.048)。两组之间的中位生存时间(MST)无差异(分别为14.7个月和14.8个月)。但是,未接受二线化疗的患者在一线接受IRIFAFU治疗时的寿命更长(MST为11.9个月,而6.4个月; P = 0.038)。 IRIFAFU引起3或4级中性粒细胞减少症的发生率显着上升(40%比9%; P = 0.001)和腹泻(13%相比4%; P = 0.024),但是口腔炎的发生率明显降低(3%比比较方案高12%; P = 0.007)。结论:IRIFAFU在活性和毒性方面与其他每周或每两周推注或输注联合治疗方案相当。但是,IRIFAFU似乎更易于管理,因为它不需要输液导管或泵装置,而且价格便宜。它可能代表了治疗晚期大肠癌的新选择。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号