首页> 外文期刊>The Review of Economic Studies >Germs, Social Networks, and Growth
【24h】

Germs, Social Networks, and Growth

机译:细菌,社交网络和增长

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Does the pattern of social connections between individuals matter for macroeconomic outcomes? If so, where do differences in these patterns come from and how large are their effects? Using network analysis tools, we explore how different social network structures affect technology diffusion and thereby a country's rate of growth. The correlation between high-diffusion networks and income is strongly positive. But when we use a model to isolate the effect of a change in social networks on growth, the effect can be positive, negative, or zero. The reason is that networks diffuse both ideas and disease. Low-diffusion networks have evolved in countries where disease is prevalent because limited connectivity protects residents from epidemics. But a low-diffusion network in a low-disease environment compromises the diffusion of good ideas. In general, social networks have evolved to fit their economic and epidemiological environment. Trying to change networks in one country to mimic those in a higher-income country may well be counterproductive.
机译:个人之间的社会联系模式对宏观经济结果有影响吗?如果是的话,这些模式的差异来自何处,它们的影响有多大?利用网络分析工具,我们探索不同的社会网络结构如何影响技术扩散,从而影响一个国家的增长率。高扩散网络与收入之间存在强正相关。但是,当我们使用一个模型来分离社交网络变化对增长的影响时,其影响可以是正的、负的,也可以是零。原因是网络传播思想和疾病。在疾病流行的国家,低扩散网络已经形成,因为有限的连通性保护居民免受流行病的影响。但是,低疾病环境中的低扩散网络会影响好想法的传播。总的来说,社会网络已经发展到适合其经济和流行病学环境。试图改变一个国家的网络,模仿高收入国家的网络,可能会适得其反。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号