首页> 外文期刊>Behavioural Brain Research: An International Journal >Do discrimination tasks discourage multi-dimensional stimulus processing? Evidence from a cross-modal object discrimination in rats.
【24h】

Do discrimination tasks discourage multi-dimensional stimulus processing? Evidence from a cross-modal object discrimination in rats.

机译:歧视任务会阻碍多维刺激处理吗?来自大鼠的跨模态物体歧视的证据。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Neurobiologists are becoming increasingly interested in how complex cognitive representations are formed by the integration of sensory stimuli. To this end, discrimination tasks are frequently used to assess perceptual and cognitive processes in animals, because they are easy to administer and score, and the ability of an animal to make a particular discrimination establishes beyond doubt that the necessary perceptual/cognitive processes are present. It does not, however, follow that absence of discrimination means the animal cannot make a particular perceptual judgement; it may simply mean that the animal did not manage to discover the relevant discriminative stimulus when trying to learn the task. Here, it is shown that rats did not learn a cross-modal object discrimination (requiring association of each object's visual appearance with its odour) when trained on the complete task from the beginning. However, they could eventually make the discrimination when trained on the component parts step by step, showing that they were able to do the necessary cross-modal integration in the right circumstances. This finding adds to growing evidence that discrimination tasks tend to encourage feature-based discrimination, perhaps by engaging automatic, habit-based brain systems. Thus, they may not be the best way to assess the formation of multi-dimensional stimulus representations of the kind needed in more complex cognitive processes such as declarative memory. Instead, more natural tasks such as spontaneous exploration may be preferable.
机译:神经生物学家对通过感觉刺激的整合如何形成复杂的认知表征越来越感兴趣。为此,歧视任务通常用于评估动物的知觉和认知过程,因为它们易于管理和评分,并且动物做出特定歧视的能力无疑会确定存在必要的知觉/认知过程。 。然而,并不能因此而得出的结论是,没有歧视就意味着动物无法做出特定的感性判断。这可能只是意味着动物在尝试学习该任务时没有设法发现相关的歧视性刺激。在这里,表明从一开始就对完整的任务进行训练时,老鼠没有学会交叉模式的物体辨别(要求每个物体的视觉外观与其气味相关联)。但是,如果逐步对零部件进行培训,他们最终可能会做出区分,这表明他们能够在正确的情况下进行必要的跨模式整合。这一发现增加了越来越多的证据,表明歧视任务倾向于鼓励基于特征的歧视,也许是通过使用自动的,基于习惯的大脑系统。因此,它们可能不是评估更复杂的认知过程(如声明性记忆)所需的多维刺激表示形式的最佳方式。相反,更自然的任务(例如自发探索)可能更可取。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号