首页> 外文期刊>The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery: MRCAS >Concurrent, face, content, and construct validity of the RobotiX Mentor simulator for robotic basic skills
【24h】

Concurrent, face, content, and construct validity of the RobotiX Mentor simulator for robotic basic skills

机译:用于机器人基本技能的机器人模拟器的并发,面部,内容和构建有效性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Objectives: To assess several criteria, such as concurrent, face, content, and construct validity of the RobotiX Mentor (RXM) simulator for basic robotic skills and to compare virtual and actual dry lab dome. Methods: A prospective study was conducted from December 2017 to May 2018 using RXM and a da Vinci Si robot. 37 subjects, divided into three groups according to their initial surgical training (expert, intermediate, and novice), were evaluated in terms of six representative exercises of basic robotic specific skills as recommended by the fundamentals of robotic surgery. Results: There was a correlation between the automatic data from the RXM and the subjective evaluation with the robot. The face and content validity, which were evaluated by the experts, were generally considered high (71.5% and 62.5%, respectively). Three levels (analysis of variance [ANOVA]; P = .01) and two levels (P = .001) of experience were clearly identified by the simulator. Conclusion: Our study proves the concurrent validity and confirms the face, content, and construct validity of the RXM.
机译:目标:评估RobotiX Mentor(RXM)基本机器人技能模拟器的几个标准,如并发、面部、内容和结构有效性,并比较虚拟和实际干燥实验室穹顶。方法:2017年12月至2018年5月,使用RXM和达芬奇Si机器人进行前瞻性研究。37名受试者根据其最初的外科训练分为三组(专家、中级和新手),根据《机器人外科基础》推荐的六项机器人特定基本技能的代表性练习进行评估。结果:来自RXM的自动数据与机器人的主观评价之间存在相关性。由专家评估的面部和内容效度通常被认为很高(分别为71.5%和62.5%)。模拟器清楚地确定了三个水平(方差分析[ANOVA];P=0.01)和两个水平(P=0.001)的经验。结论:我们的研究证实了RXM的同时效度,并证实了RXM的表面效度、内容效度和结构效度。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号