首页> 外文期刊>The British Journal of Nutrition >Identification of psychological correlates of dietary misreporting under laboratory and free-living environments
【24h】

Identification of psychological correlates of dietary misreporting under laboratory and free-living environments

机译:鉴定实验室和自由生活环境下膳食误报的心理关联

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Errors inherent in self-reported measures of energy intake (EI) are substantial and well documented, but correlates of misreporting remain unclear. Therefore, potential predictors of misreporting were examined. In Study One, fifty-nine individuals (BMI = 26.1 ( SD 3.8) kg/m2, age= 42.7 ( SD 13.6) years, females = 29) completed a 14-d stay in a residential feeding behaviour suite where eating behaviour was continuously monitored. In Study Two, 182 individuals (BMI = 25.7 ( SD 3.9) kg/m2, age = 42.4 ( SD 12.2) years, females = 96) completed two consecutive days in a residential feeding suite and five consecutive days at home. Misreporting was directly quantified by comparing covertly measured laboratory weighed intakes (LWI) with self-reported EI (weighed dietary record (WDR), 24-h recall, 7-d diet history, FFQ). Personal (age, sex and %body fat) and psychological traits (personality, social desirability, body image, intelligence quotient and eating behaviour) were used as predictors of misreporting. In Study One, those with lower psychoticism (P = 0.009), openness to experience (P = 0.006) and higher agreeableness (P = 0.038) reduced EI on days participants knew EI was being measured to a greater extent than on covert days. Isolated associations existed between personality traits (psychoticism and openness to experience), eating behaviour (emotional eating) and differences between the LWI and self-reported EI, but these were inconsistent between dietary assessment techniques and typically became non-significant after accounting for multiplicity of comparisons. In Study Two, sex was associated with differences between LWI and the WDR (P = 0.009), 24-h recall (P = 0.002) and diet history (P = 0.050) in the laboratory, but not home environment. Personal and psychological correlates of misreporting identified displayed no clear pattern across studies or dietary assessment techniques and had little utility in predicting misreporting.
机译:自我报告的能量摄入测量(EI)中固有的错误是大量的,并且有充分的记录,但误报的相关性仍然不清楚。因此,研究了误报的潜在预测因素。在研究一中,59名受试者(BMI=26.1(SD 3.8)kg/m2,年龄=42.7(SD 13.6)岁,女性=29)在持续监测饮食行为的住宅喂养行为套房中完成了14天的停留。在研究二中,182名受试者(体重指数=25.7(标准差3.9)kg/m2,年龄=42.4(标准差12.2)岁,女性=96)连续两天在住宅喂养套房内完成,连续五天在家完成。通过比较隐蔽测量的实验室称重摄入量(LWI)和自我报告的EI(称重饮食记录(WDR)、24小时回忆、7天饮食史、FFQ),直接量化误报。个人(年龄、性别和体脂百分比)和心理特征(个性、社会期望、身体形象、智商和饮食行为)被用作误报的预测因子。在研究一中,精神病性较低(P=0.009)、经验开放性(P=0.006)和宜人性较高(P=0.038)的人在参与者知道EI的测量范围比隐蔽日更大时,EI降低。人格特征(精神病性和经验开放性)、饮食行为(情绪饮食)以及LWI和自我报告EI之间的差异之间存在孤立的关联,但饮食评估技术之间不一致,在考虑多重比较后,这些关联通常变得不显著。在研究二中,性别与实验室中LWI和WDR(P=0.009)、24小时回忆(P=0.002)和饮食史(P=0.050)之间的差异有关,但与家庭环境无关。在研究或饮食评估技术中,误报的个人和心理相关因素没有显示出明确的模式,在预测误报方面几乎没有用处。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号