首页> 外文期刊>The British journal of general practice: the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners >Promoting physical activity in primary care: a systematic review and meta-analysis
【24h】

Promoting physical activity in primary care: a systematic review and meta-analysis

机译:在初级保健中促进身体活动:系统审查和荟萃分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Background Promoting physical activity is an important part of patient care in primary care and has been investigated in many studies with a wide range of intervention characteristics, often including external support. It is unclear, however, if promoting physical activity is effective. Aim To investigate the effectiveness of behaviour change interventions to promote physical activity in primary care. Design and setting This is a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate physical activity promotion in a primary care setting. Method EMBASE, MEDLINE, PsycInfo, and the Joanna Briggs Institute Database were searched for ‘physical activity’, ‘interview’, ‘motivation’, ‘primary care’, and equivalent words to identify randomised controlled trials with physical activity as the outcome at patient level. Results The review identified 24 eligible studies. The quality appraisal showed that most studies reported insufficient details regarding randomisation, group allocation, blinding, and fidelity of intervention delivery. The included studies reported a wide range of interventions with varying numbers of follow-up visits or phone calls. The overall effect size for interventions with a 6-month follow-up interval was 0.04 (95% confidence interval [CI] = ?0.06 to 0.14), and for interventions with a 12-month follow-up interval it was 0.20 (95% CI = 0.04 to 0.36). Only one intervention based on three motivational interviewing sessions achieved a moderate effect. Conclusion Counselling to promote physical activity in primary care has a limited effect on patients’ behaviour and it might not, on its own, be enough to change physical activity behaviour.
机译:背景促进体力活动是初级保健患者护理的一个重要组成部分,在许多具有广泛干预特征的研究中进行了调查,通常包括外部支持。然而,目前尚不清楚促进体育活动是否有效。目的调查行为改变干预措施在初级保健中促进体力活动的有效性。设计与设置这是一项系统性回顾和荟萃分析,旨在评估初级保健环境中的体育活动促进。方法在EMBASE、MEDLINE、PsycInfo和Joanna Briggs研究所数据库中搜索“体力活动”、“访谈”、“动机”、“初级保健”和等效词,以确定以体力活动作为患者水平结果的随机对照试验。结果该综述确定了24项合格研究。质量评估显示,大多数研究报告的关于随机性、组分配、盲法和干预交付保真度的细节不足。包括的研究报告了广泛的干预措施,包括不同数量的随访或电话。随访时间为6个月的干预措施的总体效应大小为0.04(95%置信区间[CI]=?0.06至0.14),而随访时间为12个月的干预措施的总体效应大小为0.20(95%置信区间=0.04至0.36)。只有一项基于三次动机式访谈的干预取得了中等效果。结论在初级保健中,促进体力活动的咨询对患者行为的影响有限,其本身可能不足以改变体力活动行为。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号