...
首页> 外文期刊>The British journal of general practice: the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners >The readability of general practice websites: a cross-sectional analysis of all general practice websites in Scotland
【24h】

The readability of general practice websites: a cross-sectional analysis of all general practice websites in Scotland

机译:一般练习网站的可读性:苏格兰所有一般练习网站的横截面分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background General practice websites are an increasingly important point of interaction, but their readability is largely unexplored. One in four adults struggle with basic literacy, and there is a socioeconomic gradient. Readable content is a prerequisite to promoting health literacy. Aim To assess general practice website readability by analysing text and design factors, and to assess whether practices adapted their website text to the likely literacy levels of their populations. Design and setting Websites for all general practices across Scotland were analysed from March to December 2019, using a cross-sectional design. Method Text was extracted from five webpages per website and eight text readability factors were measured, including the Flesch Reading Ease and the Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level. The relationship between readability and a practice population’s level of deprivation, measured using the Scottish Index of Multiple Deprivation (SIMD), was assessed. Overall, 10 design factors contributing to readability and accessibility were scored. Results In total, 86.4% ( n = 813/941) of Scottish practices had a website; 22.9% ( n = 874/3823) of webpages were written at, or below, the government-recommended reading level for online content (9–14 years old), and the content of the remaining websites, 77.1% ( n = 2949/3823), was suitable for a higher reading age. Of all webpages, 80.5% ( n = 3077/3823) were above the recommended level for easy-to-understand ‘plain English’. There was no statistically significant association between webpage reading age and SIMD. Only 6.7% ( n = 51/764) of websites achieved all design and accessibility recommendations. Conclusion Changes to practice websites could improve readability and promote health literacy, but practices will need financial resources and ongoing technical support if this is to be achieved and maintained. Failure to provide readable and accessible websites may widen health inequalities; the topic will become increasingly important as online service use accelerates.
机译:背景:全科医学网站是一个越来越重要的互动点,但它们的可读性在很大程度上还没有得到探索。四分之一的成年人难以掌握基本的识字能力,而且存在社会经济梯度。可读性内容是提高健康素养的先决条件。目的通过分析文本和设计因素来评估一般实践网站的可读性,并评估实践是否使其网站文本适应其人群可能的识字水平。2019年3月至12月,采用横断面设计,对苏格兰所有常规做法的设计和设置网站进行了分析。方法从每个网站的5个网页中提取文本,并测量8个文本可读性因素,包括Flesch阅读难易度和Flesch-Kincaid等级。采用苏格兰多重剥夺指数(SIMD)评估了可读性与实际人群剥夺水平之间的关系。总的来说,有助于可读性和可访问性的10个设计因素得到了评分。结果86.4%(n=813/941)的苏格兰医疗机构有网站;22.9%(n=874/3823)的网页写在或低于政府建议的在线内容阅读水平(9-14岁),其余77.1%(n=2949/3823)的网站内容适合更高的阅读年龄。在所有网页中,80.5%(n=3077/3823)高于易懂的“普通英语”推荐水平。网页阅读年龄和SIMD之间没有统计学上的显著关联。只有6.7%(n=51/764)的网站达到了所有设计和可访问性建议。结论改变实践网站可以提高可读性和促进健康素养,但实践需要财政资源和持续的技术支持才能实现和维持。未能提供可读和可访问的网站可能会扩大健康不平等;随着在线服务使用的加速,这个话题将变得越来越重要。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号