首页> 外文期刊>Annals of Biomedical Engineering: The Journal of the Biomedical Engineering Society >Non-invasive estimation of cerebrospinal fluid pressure waveforms by means of retinal venous pulsatility and central aortic blood pressure
【24h】

Non-invasive estimation of cerebrospinal fluid pressure waveforms by means of retinal venous pulsatility and central aortic blood pressure

机译:视网膜静脉搏动和主动脉血压无创估计脑脊液压力波形

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Current techniques used for cerebrospinal fluid pressure (CSFp) measurements are invasive. They require a surgical procedure for placement of a pressure catheter in the brain ventricles or in the brain tissue. The human eye provides direct visualisation of its physiological structures and due to its anatomical connection with CSF via the retrolaminar optic nerve it may provide accessible information about CSFp. A total of 25 subjects were included in this study. 15 subjects were used to characterise the relationship between intraocular pressure (IOP), spontaneous retinal venous pulsatility (SRVP), and CSFp. IOP was manipulated and SRVP amplitudes recorded dynamically using the dynamic vessel analyzer (DVA). The relationship between IOP and SRVP amplitude was established to estimate CSFp. Additionally Doppler blood flow velocity of the middle cerebral artery and arterial blood pressure (ABP) were acquired for all subjects. This was to compare and validate our findings with an alternative approach (ICM+) which uses these values to estimate CSFp. A CSFp waveform was extracted from central blood pressure (CBP) waveform by removing its cardiac component frequency. Furthermore to calibrate the CSFp to CBP waveform ratio, invasive CSFp, and ABP was measured from 10 subjects with brain tumours who had a range of normal to elevated CSFp (i.e., 0-30 mmHg). Results show good agreement between the two methods (correlation r 2 = 0.55) Mean estimated CSFp for the two techniques did not show any significant difference (p 0.05). A significant correlation between CBP pulse (CBPp) and invasive CSFp pulse (CSFpp) was observed (i.e., CSFpp = 0.0654CBBp + 3.91, p 0.01). Estimated CSFpp was calibrated to CBPp according to this relation. In conclusion, the study demonstrated a good correlation between two different methods of estimating CSFp non-invasively and may provide a novel method to estimate CSF waveforms non-invasively.
机译:用于脑脊液压力(CSFp)测量的当前技术是侵入性的。他们需要外科手术程序才能将压力导管放置在脑室或脑组织中。人眼可以直接看到其生理结构,并且由于其通过椎板后视神经与CSF的解剖连接,因此可以提供有关CSFp的可访问信息。本研究共包括25名受试者。 15位受试者用于表征眼内压(IOP),自发性视网膜静脉搏动(SRVP)和CSFp之间的关系。使用动态血管分析仪(DVA)对IOP进行操作并动态记录SRVP幅度。建立IOP和SRVP幅度之间的关系以估计CSFp。另外,为所有受试者获得了大脑中动脉的多普勒血流速度和动脉血压(ABP)。这是为了使用另一种方法(ICM +)来比较和验证我们的发现,该方法使用这些值来估计CSFp。通过去除中央血压(CBP)的心脏成分频率来提取CSFp波形。此外,为了校准CSFp与CBP的波形比,对10名脑肿瘤的CSFp正常至升高范围(即0-30 mmHg)的受试者进行了有创CSFp和ABP的测量。结果表明两种方法之间的一致性很好(相关性r 2 = 0.55)两种技术的平均CSFp估计值无显着差异(p> 0.05)。观察到CBP脉冲(CBPp)与侵入性CSFp脉冲(CSFpp)之间存在显着相关性(即CSFpp = 0.0654CBBp + 3.91,p <0.01)。根据此关系将估计的CSFpp校准为CBPp。总之,该研究表明两种不同的非侵入性CSFp估计方法之间具有良好的相关性,可能为非侵入性估计CSF波形提供一种新方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号