...
首页> 外文期刊>Animal Reproduction Science >Comparison of three estrus detection systems during summer in a large commercial dairy herd
【24h】

Comparison of three estrus detection systems during summer in a large commercial dairy herd

机译:大型商业奶牛场夏季三种发情检测系统的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The objective of the study was to compare three systems for estrus detection and combinations of these systems on a large commercial dairy (1075 lactating cows) during stress of summer heat. At 37-45 days in milk (DIM), 255 cows were fitted with a HeatWatch device (HW; DDx Inc., Denver, CO), an activity sensor ALPRO (ALPRO; DeLaval Inc., Kansas City, MO), and visually observed (VO) three times daily. Pregnancy status was determined by uterine palpation per rectum 35-49 days following artificial insemination (AI). Effects of DIM, parity, standing events, inseminator, and interval between onset of estrus and AI on conception rates were determined using logistic regression. Efficiencies for detection of estrus, determined by comparing detected periods of estrus with a theoretical total of 570 periods, were 49.3% (VO), 37.2% (ALPRO), 48.0% (HW), and 80.2% for all three systems simultaneously. Conception rates (LSM+/-S.E.) for cows detected by one or more of the three systems were 6.2+/-3.9 for VO, 19.8+/-5.6 for ALPRO, 17.3+/-5.0 for HW, 22.8+/-7.0 for VO+ALPRO, 26.9+/-4.6 for VO+HW, 23.2+/-5.2 for ALPRO+HW, and 18.4+/-4.7 for VO+ALPRO+HW. Inseminations performed during no and mild heat stress (temperature-humidity index; THI< or =76) had greater conception rate (P<0.05; 38.8%) compared to AI performed during moderated heat stress conditions (THI>76; 17.6%). Number of mounts were higher for primiparous versus multiparous cows (P<0.05). Cows over 80 DIM during estrus exhibited fewer (P<0.05) standing events. The highest conception rate occurred with the combination of VO+HW, which confirms the premise that combination of multiple systems enhances both the efficiency and accuracy of estrus detection.
机译:该研究的目的是比较夏季高温胁迫下大型商业奶牛场(1075头奶牛)上发情检测的三种系统以及这些系统的组合。在37-45天的牛奶(DIM)中,对255头母牛安装了HeatWatch设备(HW; DDx Inc.,丹佛,CO),活动传感器ALPRO(ALPRO; DeLaval Inc.,堪萨斯城,密苏里州),并在视觉上每天观察(VO)3次。人工授精(AI)后35-49天通过直肠触诊子宫来确定怀孕状态。使用logistic回归确定DIM,胎次,站立事件,授精以及发情和AI发作之间的间隔对受孕率的影响。通过比较检测到的发情周期与理论上总共有570个周期来确定发情的效率,所有这三个系统的发效率分别为49.3%(VO),37.2%(ALPRO),48.0%(HW)和80.2%。通过三个系统中的一个或多个系统检测到的母牛的受胎率(LSM +/- SE)为VO 6.2 +/- 3.9,ALPRO为19.8 +/- 5.6,HW为17.3 +/- 5.0,HW为22.8 +/- 7.0 VO + ALPRO,VO + HW为26.9 +/- 4.6,ALPRO + HW为23.2 +/- 5.2,VO + ALPRO + HW为18.4 +/- 4.7。与适度热应激条件下的人工授精(THI> 76; 17.6%)相比,在无和轻度热应激(温度-湿度指数; THI <或= 76)期间进行的授精受孕率更高(P <0.05; 38.8%)。初产奶牛与多胎奶牛的坐骑数量更高(P <0.05)。发情期超过80 DIM的母牛表现出较少的站立事件(P <0.05)。 VO + HW的结合产生最高的受孕率,这证实了多个系统结合可以提高发情检测效率和准确性的前提。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号